As a child 40 years ago, Mohammad Hassan Sharifzadeh saw the opening salvos of the Islamic revolution in Iran, starting with a particularly strange scene in a mosque in the holy city of Qom.
Mohammad was eight years old on Jan. 8, 1978, and visiting the mosque with his father in front of the Fatima Masumeh shrine — one of the holiest sites in Iran.
Then something shocking happened: A senior cleric took off his turban and threw it on the ground in disgust.
The reason behind this symbolic gesture — one reserved for displaying only the most grievous offense — was the publication of an article the day before against Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who would soon lead the country into an Islamic revolution.
“He was angry that they had insulted our source of emulation,” said Mohammad, now a sweets seller.
Each Shiite Muslim must choose an ayatollah as his “source of emulation” — and many in Iran had chosen the politically radical Khomeini, who by then had spent 13 years in exile for his scathing attacks on shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and the US.
The article in government newspaper Ettelaat had accused Khomeini of being a British agent, in league with communists, and insinuated that he was not really Iranian and that his religious credentials were questionable.
It is often seen as the moment that sparked the revolution 40 years ago.
Iran’s Islamic rulers have many commemorations planned for the anniversary as they flaunt the unlikely survival of a regime that has often been written off by analysts and opponents, but which once again saw off a major bout of unrest in recent days.
Ayatollah Seyyed Hossein Mousavi Tabrizi, a former chief prosecutor and two-time parliamentarian, was a teacher in one of Qom’s many seminaries — hawzats — when he first heard about the article.
“It was about 7pm when two or three of my students came to me, very angry, with a copy of Ettelaat and told me to read the article,” Tabrizi told reporters in Qom, where he has gone back to teaching.
“It was the last straw. Insulting Khomeini like that, saying he was a pawn of the British and other offenses — it was an insult to the whole clergy. It was a provocation,” he said.
Although Iran’s Islamic rulers focus most of their ire on the US these days, many Iranians still reserve a particular suspicion for the British in memory of their colonial machinations in the early 20th century.
Qom’s clerics quickly organized a response.
That same night, a dozen senior clerics gathered at the home of Tabrizi’s father-in-law, Grand Ayatollah Hossein Nouri Hamedani.
“It was decided to stop classes the next day as a sign of protest,” Tabrizi said — a rare move in a place that prized education so highly.
The strike by students on Jan. 8 saw minor clashes with police. It grew the following day and gathered support from merchants in the bazaar who joined the shutdown.
Soon the protests were widespread, with people chanting slogans against the monarchy and the government.
The spark had been thrown into the tinder box of grievances that had been building for years over growing social inequality, hatred of the brutish security services and an increasing Westernization that had scandalized the country’s religious conservatives.
Abolfazl Soleimani, a white-turbaned cleric in Qom, was 24 at the time and remembers the scene at Eram Square, now called Shohada (Martyrs’) Square.
“The police opened fire, first in the air, I think, and then into the crowd, at the religious, the non-religious, the bazaaris [merchants]. There were several dead and injured,” he said.
Historians have since questioned the original death toll of 20 to 30, with British historian Michael Axworthy saying in his book Revolutionary Iran that “there were no more than five.”
Either way, news of the shootings in Qom swept across the country and set in train a cycle of unrest that would ultimately lead to the downfall of the shah little more than a year later.
Conforming to Shiite tradition, mourning ceremonies were held for the dead 40 days later — on Feb. 18 — providing a pretext for fresh protests against the shah in several cities.
In Tabriz in northwestern Iran, those protests quickly degenerated, with police firing on the crowd and killing about 30 people.
Forty days later came further ceremonies that turned angry, in turn sparking more protests 40 days after that.
The authorities managed to calm things down by June, but the ball was already rolling, and the second half of 1978 saw escalating unrest.
“All repressive regimes dig their own graves,” Tabrizi said.
On Jan. 16, 1979, the shah left Iran, never to return.
Ayatollah Khomeini made a triumphant return to Iran the following month and the last government of imperial Iran was soon at an end.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS