The government’s months-long talk of setting up a state investment corporation to promote, manage and finance emerging industries while addressing certain industrial concerns is likely to bear fruit soon.
According to media reports last week, Premier Lin Chuan (林全) approved the appointment of former vice premier Wu Rong-i (吳榮義) as the corporation’s chairman. Lin adopted his economic policy advisers’ suggestion to have Asia Silicon Valley Development Agency chief investment officer David Weng (翁嘉盛) double as CEO of the new company.
Based on the same reports, the government is to establish a preparatory office for the new national investment corporation by the end of this month.
With initial paid-in capital of NT$250 million (US$8.28 million), the new company is to emphasize development of the so-called “five plus two” innovative industries: “green” energy, national defense, biotechnology, “smart” machinery and the Internet of Things, as well as promotion of a new agricultural paradigm and a circular economy. It will also focus on promising start-ups with valuable technologies.
The company is expected to function as a kind of management consulting firm and manage three investment funds with a total value of NT$10 billion. As the government aims to partner with private investors and business leaders in operating this new investment corporation, it is to provide less than 40 percent of the initial investment in the company, with the remaining 60 percent or more to come from the private sector.
It is now possible to piece together some facts about the national investment corporation, such as its operational model, shareholder structure and investment goals. As the government would not be the largest shareholder, it would likely be run by private-sector professionals to maximize returns and keep management flexible while minimizing bureaucratic indolence and inefficiency.
The new institution is envisioned to become a major driver of industrial innovation, transformation and technological advancement. However, several details, such as the sources of capital, supervisory mechanisms, organizational regulations and post-investment management have yet to be fleshed out.
There are still other questions and it is no wonder that some industry watchers have cast doubt on the effectiveness of the plan. For instance, as Taiwan already has a National Development Fund, which cooperates with local and foreign venture capital firms to finance Taiwanese start-ups, what would set apart the new corporation’s investment strategies and financial operations? Will there be an effective mechanism that can help coordinate the activities of the two to avoid overlapping with their investments? And will NT$10 billion be enough to achieve the goal of encouraging start-up growth?
Even so, the plan promises to help local start-ups with strong potential that lack sufficient investment and mentorship to expand their operations. It also provides an opportunity for the nation to develop talented people that have strong investment expertise and an ability to help supervise fledgling companies.
However, first the corporation will need to have a clear idea about what local industries need and what it can offer. It must also recruit a strong management team with access to potential investors.
As Taiwanese politicians’ cautious attitudes toward investment pose one of the biggest hurdles to start-up development, the government this time needs to adopt a more hands-off approach and give major responsibilities to investment professionals.
There has been no shortage of criticism of government policy initiatives in the past few years. However, what society needs is constructive discussion among the public and useful suggestions to the government that help the new investment corporation achieve its goals and encourage close collaboration between the public and private sectors.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS