When I was traveling in Taiwan recently I saw a sign in a toilet that drew my attention. It was a notice “reminding” people to take their personal belongings, while other signs posted near the sink told people that special devices to detect hidden cameras have been installed. These signs, although seemingly insignificant, are perfect examples of the distinct cultural differences between Taiwanese, Chinese and Hong Kongers.
Having being ruled by the British for about 150 years, Hong Kong prides itself as being highly civilized and law-abiding. Nevertheless, at the Mass Transit Railway stations, broadcasts warning people to be careful of pickpockets are given. In library study rooms there are signs that remind people to watch their belongings, even though people are supposed to concentrate on studying. Such signs reveal a habit of suspicion due to a lack of trust deeply rooted in Hong Kong culture.
As I have stopped going to China — which calls itself “the nation of etiquette and propriety” — since I began writing political commentaries, I quote from Hong Kongers who still go there.
Hong Kong writer Benny Li (李純恩), when he tried to withdraw money from an ATM in China, said:
“As soon as I entered the booth, a recorded voice said ‘close and lock the door.’ Frightened, I quickly turned around and locked the door, but before I could start operating the machine, the voice told me to cover the screen with my hand while entering my password so that no one could see it. Given that I was already in a booth with no windows, how would anyone be able to see my password? I could not stop looking around, as the voice continued: ‘Do not tell anyone your password. Beware of scams.’ The warnings continued as I collected my money, making me very anxious the whole time.”
While Hong Kongers are suspicious of others and Chinese treat everyone like a thief — although there are indeed thieves everywhere in China — Taiwanese try to provide a sense of security which allows people to be free from fear. Believing that people are inherently good, Taiwanese are not always suspicious of others.
China and Taiwan are entirely different not only in their language and politics, but also in their daily life, including how they treat people. Considering these differences, the idea that the two places are culturally similar is absurd.
Although Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) intends to “punish” Taiwan by cutting the number of Chinese tourists allowed to travel to Taiwan, in my opinion Taiwanese should be very grateful for his decision. I am sure there is no need for me to explain why.
Lo Wing-hong is an independent media commentator from Hong Kong.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS