The Nazi-costume farce that played out at Hsinchu Kuang Fu High School, with the class’ teacher performing a Nazi salute, was, as many have pointed out, an indication of the nation’s poor education on its own transitional justice.
Sadly it also reflects a larger vacuum in education in general that discourages independent, systematic and logical thinking.
As the scandal gained attention, it was revealed that at the same cosplay event another class performed a skit about Aborigines killing Japanese, aiming to recreate the Wushe Incident of 1930. The host touted the skit as a “revival of the Chinese nation,” or zhonghua minzu.
Transitional justice for Aborigines is another thing the nation has gotten wrong, with Aboriginal opposition to the colonial government still misinterpreted or intentionally misappropriated for another oppressor’s political end.
Entrenched Chinese/Han-centered ideologies aside, that the misuse of history and symbols — as exposed by the Nazi-themed event — is prevalent in Taiwan cannot be separated from the fill-in-the-blanks education system that has been adopted to facilitate the grading of students.
How do you expect students to seriously deliberate the reasons for the rise of a totalitarian regime in what was supposedly a parliamentary democracy in pre-World War II Germany and learn from the lesson when what is required of them are exam answers to questions like: “What year did the Nazi regime take over,” or selections in a multiple-choice question asking them to name the causes?
If history is only about numbers — How many people were killed? What year did an incident happen? — and information is disconnected from context, students are not led to reflect on humanity. For them, history is never about people and their fears, arrogance and ignorance, but only about symbols, which will be treated with flippancy.
There is less about right and wrong, and diminished thoughts on questions of why things happened, while there will be more about simple outcomes, like who won and who lost.
There is a hint of consequentialism in this style of education. The system of “merits” and “demerits” used to grade students is an example, while the practice of writing off demerits with awards is actually in place.
It is not rare to hear Taiwanese say that a certain political leader, autocrat, or regime might have done something wrong, but they also contributed to society; the unspoken agenda is certainly that their failings might be canceled out by their contributions.
However, that is not how justice — even justice in the most naive sense — works and explains why compensation alone without holding the perpetrator accountable can never satisfy those who are treated unjustly.
Injustice cannot be erased by achievement. Injustice needs to be confronted and its makings need to be reflected on so that history can be used to understand what is going on in today’s world.
The controversy over same-sex marriage has a group of people with resources and political influence invoking fear and manipulating the public with lies to dehumanize a minority.
It might require gradual steps to achieve fully fledged legislation, but there is no “consensus” to be reached when it is not facts that the opposing groups bring to the debate.
“Conciliation” and “social harmony” should not be used as pretexts to tolerate discrimination and falsehood.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS