US President Barack Obama, facing the imminent handover to his bombastic successor, had plenty to be concerned about last week. However, he took time to express concern about the impact of fake news online when he spoke to reporters on Thursday.
Obama, who was described in a detailed New Yorker interview as being “obsessed” with the problem since the election, outlined the new ecosystem of news online in which “everything is true and nothing is true.”
“In an age where there’s so much active misinformation, and it’s packaged very well, and it looks the same when you see it on a Facebook page or you turn on your television, where some over-zealousness on the part of a US official is equated with constant and severe repression elsewhere, if everything seems to be the same and no distinctions are made, then we won’t know what to protect,” Obama said.
Illustration: Mountain People
Obama is not exaggerating.
Worse yet, in the last weeks of the US election campaign, according to an analysis by Buzzfeed News, fake news — whether claiming that the pope had endorsed US president-elect Donald Trump or that Democratic candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton sold weapons to the Islamic State group — actually outperformed real news on the platform, with more shares, reactions and comments.
Another widely shared story used a young picture of Trump with variations on a quote that he reportedly gave People magazine in 1998: “If I were to run, I’d run as a Republican. They’re the dumbest group of voters in the country. They believe anything on Fox News. I could lie and they’d still eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific.”
Yet Trump never said that. It is not even possible to know how widely the quote was shared, with a new version created every time another is flagged and removed.
Memes like this replicate across the Internet like a virus in this way, so the quote, tantalizing in its plausibility and pitch-perfect for quick sharing, has been shared hundreds of thousands, potentially millions of times.
Facebook has faced many controversies in its 12 short years, but has fumbled with the gravity and impact of its editorial power in an age where 62 percent of US adults turn to social media for some or all of their news, according to the Pew Research Center.
In the early days of the US election, Facebook was criticized for what was perceived as over-zealous curation of its “trending topics” chart. When conservative outlets accused it of censoring right-leaning news stories, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg fired the trending stories team and replaced them with an algorithm — which almost immediately began to distribute fake news.
The problem went unaddressed.
Sources told technology Web site Gizmodo that high-level meetings at Facebook have been under way since May, when a planned update to identify fake news was shelved after it was found to disproportionately impact right-wing sites, although Facebook officially denies that this happened.
Part of the problem, experts say, is that many people share articles based on the headline alone and do not even read the story — let alone apply any skepticism to the claims within.
Another viral story by the “Denver Guardian” claimed, completely falsely, that an FBI agent investigating Clinton had been killed in a house fire in Colorado.
It prompted the Denver Post — a newspaper that does actually exist and was founded in 1892 — to explain that “there is no such thing as the Denver Guardian,” pointing out that the address it listed as its base led to a tree in a Denver car park.
In one way, the problem is not a new one. Publications such as the National Enquirer in the US have long bent the truth, often shamelessly.
However, now a fake story can much more easily masquerade as real, because in Facebook’s walled garden, all the posts look largely the same — a New York Times investigation alongside a fake story claiming Taylor Swift endorsed Trump.
The ease of deception has given birth to a brand new cottage industry.
This month, Buzzfeed discovered that many of the pro-Trump fake news sites — more than 100 of them — were being operated as for-profit click-farms by Macedonian teenagers.
By Nov. 5, Zuckerberg was facing mounting pressure to address the problem.
“Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99 percent of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes,” he wrote on his Facebook page. “The hoaxes that do exist are not limited to one partisan view, or even to politics. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.”
Experts say this statement sounds like Zuckerberg is in denial.
“As long as Mark Zuckerberg refuses to understand his own system, there is no hope for Facebook reforming itself,” University of Virginia professor of media studies Siva Vaidhyanathan said. “Facebook and its leaders have consistently applauded themselves for connecting millions of people around the world and enabling friction-free conversation, and have gladly taken unwarranted credit for pro-democracy movements in different parts of the world, and yet Zuckerberg himself has denied any moral responsibility for the fact that Facebook has helped poison American democracy.”
The problem is not just limited to the latest US presidential election cycle, Vaidyanathan said.
“The harmful information that spreads on Facebook includes the myths and lies about vaccination and links to autism. It contains myths and lies about the scientific fact of global warming. These are issues that are crucial to our well-being and there is no algorithm that can distinguish a fact from a lie,” he said.
On Monday, Google and Facebook both announced that they would be making it harder for fake news sites to make money via their advertising networks — though this does not address Facebook’s news feed problem.
Pressure continues to grow, even from within Facebook itself.
A report emerged on Monday that a “renegade” group of “more than dozens” of Facebook employees had formed a task force, kept secret from upper management, to try to address the issue.
“[Zuckerberg] knows, and those of us at the company know, that fake news ran wild on our platform during the entire campaign season,” one Facebook employee anonymously told Buzzfeed.
Hundreds more had privately expressed dissatisfaction with how the company had dealt with the problem.
Merrimack College assistant professor of communication and media Melissa Zimdars said that she was concerned about some of the sources her students in Massachusetts were finding and using online, so she created a Google document which lists a number of sites and which has since gone viral.
Not all are fake. Many are satirical sites like The Onion or the New Yorker’s Borowitz Report, while others are news organizations whose stories are often slanted, like Breitbart on the right or Occupy Democrats on the left.
“There are things that readers can do, but there are [also] things structurally and within the culture of journalism itself that need to change,” Zimdars said. “One thing readers can do is to read what they’re sharing, and after that if you read something and have a strong reaction to it, read more about it rather than just accept what you originally read as complete information.”
The only solution to Facebook’s problem is the laborious and labor-intensive human checking of facts, Vaidhyanathan said.
“Facebook would have to hire thousands of human beings who are trained to make editorial judgements, and could step in and edit news feeds,” he said.
In the meantime, it is as if Zuckerberg is using some different version of Facebook unafflicted by hoax stories and misinformation.
“The rest of us know too well the corrosive power of fake news,” Vaidhyanathan said.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)
RSS