The hunt for documents
A few days ago, military police entered a private residence looking for government documents from the White Terror era.
I have been collecting historical documents for more than two decades.
When other collectors saw what the military police had done, many removed the historical items they had put up for sale on the Internet and hid them, as a White Terror era atmosphere quickly spread among collectors of historical documents.
Since I started collecting such items, I have made many friends, some of who have spent hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars collecting historical Taiwanese documents, while others have traveled the world to build their collections.
The wealth of their collections and the effort they have put into them exceed even that of some government agencies. They have made a great contribution to the nation through their collections and their knowledge, and they play an important part in the excavation of the truth about Taiwan’s past.
After military police conducted the search, Premier Simon Chang (張善政) said that the government would start collecting, scanning and saving confidential documents that are found for research.
The Ministry of National Defense said that people should “return such documents voluntarily” to the military.
Does the ministry really think collectors who have spent huge sums of money and invested considerable time would voluntarily hand over their collections?
The only way to make this happen would be if the government clearly delineated the relevant laws and regulations and allocated a budget to buy the documents back.
Chiu Kuang-shui
Taoyuan
Stop self-immolations
I have heard about Dorjee Tsering, a student who died three days after setting himself on fire on Feb. 29 in Dehradun, India, while shouting “Free Tibet,” according to an advocacy group based in London.
The Free Tibet group said: “His father, Thupten, told Free Tibet’s research partner Tibet Watch that this is a heartbreaking incident, but he is proud of his son and his sacrifice for the Tibetan nation.”
Please let me give a short commentary about Tsering’s heartbreaking story.
My name is Christian Thomas Kohl. I have belonged to the Tibetan Buddhist tradition since 1983. My first teacher was Kalu Rinpoche. I have three children and two grandchildren. I am a teacher of politics and history. My students are 15 years old.
I feel for Tsering like he was my son or my student. I feel very sorry for him, his parents and siblings.
I am well informed about the horrible situation Tibet has been in since 1959. I am a specialist in the history of communism.
The Chinese government is strong, so are Chinese bank managers. They are the ruling class of China.
The Chinese majority would not give up Tibet. Even a democratic China would be under the command of bank managers like those in Hong Kong, they would not grant independence or autonomy to Tibet.
Tibet has no chance for freedom, independence or autonomy. No sacrifice for Tibet would help. Shouting “Free Tibet” would not help.
Every father and every mother can be proud when they have a son or a daughter alive, not dead.
The Tibetan population is treated by the ruling managers of China as if they were animals. This is more or less well known.
However, no self-immolation can change this.
Please, my sons and my daughters of Tibet, do not immolate yourselves. Do not break the hearts of your mothers.
I feel so sorry for Tsering and for his mother.
Christian Thomas Kohl
Freiburg, Germany
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS