Of the many factors that keep small-scale Ugandan farmers poor, seed counterfeiting may be the least understood. Passing under the radar of the international development sector, a whole illegal industry has developed in Uganda, cheating farmers by selling them seeds that promise high yields, but fail to germinate at all — with results that can be disastrous.
Counterfeiting gangs have learned to dye regular maize with the characteristic pinkish orange color of industrially processed maize seed, duping farmers into paying good money for seed that just will not grow. The result is a crisis of confidence in commercially available high-yield seed.
According to a paper published by World Bank researcher James Joughin, just 13 percent of farmers buy improved seed from formal markets in Uganda. The rest rely on seeds saved from the previous season or traded informally between neighbors, but such seeds generally produce far lower yields than genuine high-yield hybrids.
“The seed market is very small compared to what you would expect from the returns to these hybrid seeds,” says David Yanagizawa-Drott, a professor at Harvard Kennedy School and part of a team now researching the problem in Uganda for the first time.
A pilot study conducted 18 months ago “found significant amounts of hybrid seeds that were falsified.”
A larger study is expected to be published this autumn.
The lack of trust in local seed markets is a problem even for large commercial farmers, some of whom have invested heavily to plant hundreds of acres with high yield hybrids that simply did not germinate.
For small-scale farmers, fear of counterfeits leaves commercial seed out of the question: when a failed harvest means outright hunger, any risk is too big to take.
Not to be confused with GM-seeds, high yield hybrids were developed in the US in the 1930s, and were at the center of the Green Revolution that transformed Asian and Latin American agriculture in the 1950s and 1960s.
BRONZE AGE METHOD
Among practitioners in agricultural development, there is a consensus about the idea that increasing the use of improved seed varieties is a must for improving the living standards of Africa’s poorest farmers. Helping spread the use of such seed has long been a target for development partners from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
However, that revolution largely by-passed Africa leaving most farmers relying on grain harvested from their own fields the previous year as seeds, a bronze age farming method that leads to yields that are up to 90 percent lower.
The breakdown of trust in rural seed markets contributes to long-standing poverty traps. Fake seed makes it impossible for Uganda’s small farmers to adopt the modern agricultural techniques that lifted millions of Asian and Latin American farmers out of extreme poverty a generation ago.
“[The] perception is that the problem is getting worse,” Joughin says.
The body charged with certifying the quality of seed on sale, the National Seed Certification Service of the Ugandan Ministry of Agriculture, has just eight people on staff and lacks the administrative resources even to carry out its core duties, let alone investigate the counterfeiting rings. Enforcement is largely non-existent.
SECOND-HAND MARKET
Nor are seeds the only agricultural inputs undermined by illegal players in the supply chain. According to Joughin, stories of adulterated agro-chemicals abound, with farmers reporting that herbicides are watered down, making it impossible for farmers to know how much to use for effective weed control.
Yanagizawa-Drott’s team is conducting a parallel research program into adulterated fertilizer, a problem that he believes could be just as serious as counterfeit seed.
Diluting and counterfeiting can happen at many levels in the supply chain.
“The seed companies typically sell seed in larger bags, relatively nice bags that are printed, but the material is often split up at the retail level because that’s what farmers want. That creates an opportunity to adulterate the product, by dying for example,” Yanagizawa-Drott says. “And once a [genuine] bag has been used there’s a second-hand market for it, apparently.”
“Part of it is happening at the retail level,” he adds. “But it could also be that retailers are also fooled by someone higher up in the supply chain.”
The team is attempting to pinpoint the location of the problem by sending mystery shoppers to different parts of the supply chain, and evaluating the seed and fertilizer they obtain.
Development partners have long recognized the key role of improving seed and other inputs, but donor funds often go to finance basic research to develop new adapted seed varieties.
Ultimately, the products of crop science reach the field through the operation of local input markets, and where governments are too weak or inefficient to police those markets, the potential for abuse is ripe — and the impact of new seed research is much reduced.
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —