Of the many factors that keep small-scale Ugandan farmers poor, seed counterfeiting may be the least understood. Passing under the radar of the international development sector, a whole illegal industry has developed in Uganda, cheating farmers by selling them seeds that promise high yields, but fail to germinate at all — with results that can be disastrous.
Counterfeiting gangs have learned to dye regular maize with the characteristic pinkish orange color of industrially processed maize seed, duping farmers into paying good money for seed that just will not grow. The result is a crisis of confidence in commercially available high-yield seed.
According to a paper published by World Bank researcher James Joughin, just 13 percent of farmers buy improved seed from formal markets in Uganda. The rest rely on seeds saved from the previous season or traded informally between neighbors, but such seeds generally produce far lower yields than genuine high-yield hybrids.
“The seed market is very small compared to what you would expect from the returns to these hybrid seeds,” says David Yanagizawa-Drott, a professor at Harvard Kennedy School and part of a team now researching the problem in Uganda for the first time.
A pilot study conducted 18 months ago “found significant amounts of hybrid seeds that were falsified.”
A larger study is expected to be published this autumn.
The lack of trust in local seed markets is a problem even for large commercial farmers, some of whom have invested heavily to plant hundreds of acres with high yield hybrids that simply did not germinate.
For small-scale farmers, fear of counterfeits leaves commercial seed out of the question: when a failed harvest means outright hunger, any risk is too big to take.
Not to be confused with GM-seeds, high yield hybrids were developed in the US in the 1930s, and were at the center of the Green Revolution that transformed Asian and Latin American agriculture in the 1950s and 1960s.
BRONZE AGE METHOD
Among practitioners in agricultural development, there is a consensus about the idea that increasing the use of improved seed varieties is a must for improving the living standards of Africa’s poorest farmers. Helping spread the use of such seed has long been a target for development partners from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
However, that revolution largely by-passed Africa leaving most farmers relying on grain harvested from their own fields the previous year as seeds, a bronze age farming method that leads to yields that are up to 90 percent lower.
The breakdown of trust in rural seed markets contributes to long-standing poverty traps. Fake seed makes it impossible for Uganda’s small farmers to adopt the modern agricultural techniques that lifted millions of Asian and Latin American farmers out of extreme poverty a generation ago.
“[The] perception is that the problem is getting worse,” Joughin says.
The body charged with certifying the quality of seed on sale, the National Seed Certification Service of the Ugandan Ministry of Agriculture, has just eight people on staff and lacks the administrative resources even to carry out its core duties, let alone investigate the counterfeiting rings. Enforcement is largely non-existent.
SECOND-HAND MARKET
Nor are seeds the only agricultural inputs undermined by illegal players in the supply chain. According to Joughin, stories of adulterated agro-chemicals abound, with farmers reporting that herbicides are watered down, making it impossible for farmers to know how much to use for effective weed control.
Yanagizawa-Drott’s team is conducting a parallel research program into adulterated fertilizer, a problem that he believes could be just as serious as counterfeit seed.
Diluting and counterfeiting can happen at many levels in the supply chain.
“The seed companies typically sell seed in larger bags, relatively nice bags that are printed, but the material is often split up at the retail level because that’s what farmers want. That creates an opportunity to adulterate the product, by dying for example,” Yanagizawa-Drott says. “And once a [genuine] bag has been used there’s a second-hand market for it, apparently.”
“Part of it is happening at the retail level,” he adds. “But it could also be that retailers are also fooled by someone higher up in the supply chain.”
The team is attempting to pinpoint the location of the problem by sending mystery shoppers to different parts of the supply chain, and evaluating the seed and fertilizer they obtain.
Development partners have long recognized the key role of improving seed and other inputs, but donor funds often go to finance basic research to develop new adapted seed varieties.
Ultimately, the products of crop science reach the field through the operation of local input markets, and where governments are too weak or inefficient to police those markets, the potential for abuse is ripe — and the impact of new seed research is much reduced.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS