Rumors and allegations concerning former Taipei EasyCard Corp chairman Sean Lien (連勝文) have emerged in the past few weeks, even though Lien has yet to say whether he will run in the Taipei mayoral election in November. Whether there is a smear campaign against him or not, he needs to offer explanations and clarification, and showing contempt for the accusations will only accentuate his arrogance. As the eldest son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), the 43-year-old Lien is seen as the most competitive potential pan-blue camp candidate for the Taipei mayoral election.
However, his political connections and wealthy background put him under scrutiny. The latest string of rumors about his reportedly lavish lifestyle during his college years at Columbia University in the US, reported by political critic Clara Chou (周玉蔻), a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) member, was apparently orchestrated by the KMT as part of the power struggle within the camp.
Chu said that the young Lien had lived in the Trump Tower in New York when studying law at Columbia University and had attended a party at the Playboy Mansion in Las Vegas. Chu refused to confirm the source of her accusations, but it is believed that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) defense counsel Song Yao-ming (宋耀明), who had represented Ma in his Taipei mayoral corruption case, provided the information. Rifts and power struggles in the KMT are nothing new, and given the long-term problematic relationship between Ma and the party’s “old force,” including Lien Chan, a KMT smear campaign against Sean Lien was predictable.
Sean Lien’s great popularity among pan-blue supporters and extensive political connections made him seem like a perfect candidate for the Taipei mayoral election. However, the rising popularity of independent Taipei mayoral aspirant Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital, caused concerns in the pan-blue camp about Sean Lien’s long-term support ratings and the KMT’s performance in the election.
Recent disputes over Sean Lien’s luxurious residence at The Palace, one of the most expensive apartment complexes in Taipei, reflected the KMT’s concerns about the negative impact of the Lien family’s wealth on his performance in the Taipei mayoral race. Sean Lien’s open criticism of the Ma administration’s performance also made him an unpopular candidate in the KMT. He and his aides have shrugged off the allegations and said they were part of a smear campaign ahead of the election. Ko said he opposed making allegations against a candidate’s “personal behavior,” and that the public should focus on candidates’ policy platforms.
However, Sean Lien must respond to the accusations if he decides to run. As part of the power transition plan, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) appointed former KMT Taipei City councilor Lin Yi-hua (林奕華) to head the city’s Department of Education so that Sean Lien could arrange for his aide, William Hsu (徐弘庭), to run for Taipei City councilor election in the competitive Daan (大安) and Wenshan (文山) electoral district.
It is time for the young Lien to take the Taipei mayoral election seriously and stop dodging accusations. He should present his campaign platform and visions for the city if he considers himself a solid Taipei mayoral candidate. Lien and the KMT should also recognize that Taipei may be a traditional stronghold for the pan-blue camp, but the election will not be easy because of the growing public discontent with the Ma administration. The old election tactics of smear campaigns and blame game will only hurt the party’s performance in the election.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,