Movie mogul Run Run Shaw (邵逸夫) died this month. While many observers have commented on Shaw Brothers’ contribution to Hong Kong cinema, Shaw’s legacy should also be examined through interactions between Shaw Brothers and Taiwan’s movie industry.
In the late 1940s, the major concern of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government was its war effort against the Chinese Communist Party. When it was forced to move to Taiwan in 1949, the KMT became focused on two priorities: claiming sovereignty over mainland China and asserting legitimacy and authority over Taiwan. Meanwhile, Hong Kong became an ideological battleground between the left-wing and right-wing film studios.
The KMT was eager to win influence in the Hong Kong film industry and stipulated that the film companies set up by Chinese nationals in Hong Kong should be eligible for funding, protection and the full benefit of the KMT’s national film policies.
The KMT was able to exert indirect influence over Hong Kong filmmakers and formed a symbiotic relationship with the British colony’s film industry, especially when left-wing film companies began losing their market in China in the early 1950s.
Shaw Brothers, representing studios from the apolitical right, became the ultimate beneficiary of the KMT’s political ideology and dominated the Chinese film market in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Southeast Asia and beyond.
Shaw Brothers brought the integration of film production, distribution and exhibition, and transformed the Hong Kong film industry into the Hollywood of the East. The industry therefore became a conventional glamor-oriented industry, producing works that would not risk political censorship in their new markets.
Taiwan was one of the earliest places in Asia to be acquainted with cinema, but Taiwanese film production was limited and emerged relatively late. When the Japanese colonial administration left Taiwan in 1945, the industry became a vacuum for many years, and the most established cinema-related activity was exhibition.
By 1949, when the KMT moved to Taiwan, there were 146 registered privately run movie theaters showing about 500 films each year. In the early 1950s, between 600 and 700 films were shown in Taiwan annually, but the ratio between foreign-language films and Chinese films was about 2.2:1.
In the early 1960s, most first-release run movie theaters in Taiwan had contracts with Hollywood studios to distribute foreign films, and it was difficult for Chinese-language films to be shown in these theaters.
However, a Shaw Brothers-produced Chinese-language musical, based on traditional “yellow plum” melodies (黃梅調), The Love Eterne (梁山伯與祝英台, directed by Li Hanxiang, 李翰祥) was a hit in 1963. The film changed the situation, and some theaters in Taipei went against their contracts with Hollywood distributors to exhibit the film.
In revenge, eight Hollywood studios stopped supplying movies to local theaters, and the theaters began to release Mandarin-language cinema instead. The first-release run theaters for Mandarin-language films increased from one to three chains between 1963 and 1964, and by the end of the 1960s, 80 percent of movie theaters in Taipei were showing such films. Taiwan and Shaw Brothers helped to break the stranglehold of theater chains on Mandarin cinema. Shaw Brothers became Taiwan’s largest distributor and supplier of Mandarin-language films.
The KMT’s Central Motion Picture Corp began producing more popular Mandarin-language projects under the Health Realism genre in the 1960s. Subsequently, many Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese)-speaking film workers drifted into the Mandarin-language sector. There was also a flow of Taiwanese-language film talent moving out of Taiwan to Shaw Brothers’ studio in Hong Kong in the late 1960s and 1970s.
Shaw Brothers specialized in lavish genre films set in ancient China, such as the “yellow plum” melody operas and historical costume drama and wuxia (martial arts) films. As location shooting in China was not an option at that time, places in Taiwan disguised as China became common screen images for Shaw productions. The Central Motion Picture Corp also became Shaw’s closest co-production partner, especially in producing ancient martial arts epics.
While the genre films produced by Shaw Brothers dominated Taiwan’s movie market in the 1960s and 1970s, Shaw’s depiction of historical and cultural China on screen, echoed by other communication outlets on the island, including mass media and education, became a familiar reference in viewers’ daily lives.
While the extent to which Shaw’s portrayal of China should be considered an aspect of Taiwan’s cultural heritage is debatable, Shaw Brothers played an important role in the nation’s popular culture and film history.
Ming-yeh Rawnsley is a research associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London and secretary-general of the European Association of Taiwan Studies.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS