Movie mogul Run Run Shaw (邵逸夫) died this month. While many observers have commented on Shaw Brothers’ contribution to Hong Kong cinema, Shaw’s legacy should also be examined through interactions between Shaw Brothers and Taiwan’s movie industry.
In the late 1940s, the major concern of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government was its war effort against the Chinese Communist Party. When it was forced to move to Taiwan in 1949, the KMT became focused on two priorities: claiming sovereignty over mainland China and asserting legitimacy and authority over Taiwan. Meanwhile, Hong Kong became an ideological battleground between the left-wing and right-wing film studios.
The KMT was eager to win influence in the Hong Kong film industry and stipulated that the film companies set up by Chinese nationals in Hong Kong should be eligible for funding, protection and the full benefit of the KMT’s national film policies.
The KMT was able to exert indirect influence over Hong Kong filmmakers and formed a symbiotic relationship with the British colony’s film industry, especially when left-wing film companies began losing their market in China in the early 1950s.
Shaw Brothers, representing studios from the apolitical right, became the ultimate beneficiary of the KMT’s political ideology and dominated the Chinese film market in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Southeast Asia and beyond.
Shaw Brothers brought the integration of film production, distribution and exhibition, and transformed the Hong Kong film industry into the Hollywood of the East. The industry therefore became a conventional glamor-oriented industry, producing works that would not risk political censorship in their new markets.
Taiwan was one of the earliest places in Asia to be acquainted with cinema, but Taiwanese film production was limited and emerged relatively late. When the Japanese colonial administration left Taiwan in 1945, the industry became a vacuum for many years, and the most established cinema-related activity was exhibition.
By 1949, when the KMT moved to Taiwan, there were 146 registered privately run movie theaters showing about 500 films each year. In the early 1950s, between 600 and 700 films were shown in Taiwan annually, but the ratio between foreign-language films and Chinese films was about 2.2:1.
In the early 1960s, most first-release run movie theaters in Taiwan had contracts with Hollywood studios to distribute foreign films, and it was difficult for Chinese-language films to be shown in these theaters.
However, a Shaw Brothers-produced Chinese-language musical, based on traditional “yellow plum” melodies (黃梅調), The Love Eterne (梁山伯與祝英台, directed by Li Hanxiang, 李翰祥) was a hit in 1963. The film changed the situation, and some theaters in Taipei went against their contracts with Hollywood distributors to exhibit the film.
In revenge, eight Hollywood studios stopped supplying movies to local theaters, and the theaters began to release Mandarin-language cinema instead. The first-release run theaters for Mandarin-language films increased from one to three chains between 1963 and 1964, and by the end of the 1960s, 80 percent of movie theaters in Taipei were showing such films. Taiwan and Shaw Brothers helped to break the stranglehold of theater chains on Mandarin cinema. Shaw Brothers became Taiwan’s largest distributor and supplier of Mandarin-language films.
The KMT’s Central Motion Picture Corp began producing more popular Mandarin-language projects under the Health Realism genre in the 1960s. Subsequently, many Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese)-speaking film workers drifted into the Mandarin-language sector. There was also a flow of Taiwanese-language film talent moving out of Taiwan to Shaw Brothers’ studio in Hong Kong in the late 1960s and 1970s.
Shaw Brothers specialized in lavish genre films set in ancient China, such as the “yellow plum” melody operas and historical costume drama and wuxia (martial arts) films. As location shooting in China was not an option at that time, places in Taiwan disguised as China became common screen images for Shaw productions. The Central Motion Picture Corp also became Shaw’s closest co-production partner, especially in producing ancient martial arts epics.
While the genre films produced by Shaw Brothers dominated Taiwan’s movie market in the 1960s and 1970s, Shaw’s depiction of historical and cultural China on screen, echoed by other communication outlets on the island, including mass media and education, became a familiar reference in viewers’ daily lives.
While the extent to which Shaw’s portrayal of China should be considered an aspect of Taiwan’s cultural heritage is debatable, Shaw Brothers played an important role in the nation’s popular culture and film history.
Ming-yeh Rawnsley is a research associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London and secretary-general of the European Association of Taiwan Studies.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS