Representative to the US King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), a close aide of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his most ardent defender, offered a rare apology on Thursday. A staff member wrote comments on a Sept. 12 report in the Washington Post about the political strife between Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) over the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) decision to revoke Wang’s party membership after allegations against Wang of improper lobbying.
The report, titled “Taiwan’s president, ruling party hit by scandal, rifts, anger over wiretapping,” discussed the political scandal and its consequences. Frank Wang (王億) director of the press division of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US said in comments on the Post’s Web site that he was “very glad the KMT came to resolutely discipline its heavyweight party member. Taiwan’s judiciary will be cleaner, and the legislative process will be smoother.”
He also referred to Wang Jin-pyng as “former legislative speaker” even though he has retained his role as speaker and his party membership after a Taipei District Court injunction.
King apologized in a statement for letting his subordinate issue personal opinions on the incident and failing to maintain the office’s neutrality. He promised to instruct officials not to post personal comments that do not represent the office’s official position.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), who obtained a copy of the letter to the editor penned by Frank Wang, accused King of lying when he said that he did not notice that the online messages were different from the letter, which indicated that the controversial comment had been added by King or another official.
It is unimportant who is responsible for the controversial comments, but judging from the office’s response, it is necessary for King, as the representative to the US, to offer a formal apology over his negligence.
However, as Ma’s confidant, known for his sharp attacks on Ma’s political rivals and critics, King is in no position to apologize for his subordinate’s defense of the president. He has violated the principle of neutrality and abused his authority too many times in defending Ma.
When King served as the information and news director during Ma’s Taipei mayoral term, many press officials and media executives were pressed not to carry negative coverage of the mayor. Interference in the media worsened over the years as Ma rose to become president and KMT chairman.
The latest example is political pundit Nan Fang Shuo’s (南方朔) accusations that the Ma administration persuaded the Chinese-language newspaper the China Times to reject his column on Sept. 17. He said this was done because it was critical of the president’s move against the speaker and described King, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), then-deputy secretary-general Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) and Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) as the “gang of four” involved in a “premeditated plan” against Wang Jin-pyng.
King fired back at the accusations and said he has filed a lawsuit against the pundit to defend his reputation and to stem abuse of freedom of speech.
It is outrageous, yet predictable, that King is still waging war on media coverage against Ma even though he is now the nation’s representative to the US. His priorities should be strengthening Taiwan-US relations, rather than paying attention to how local media have interpreted the wiretapping and lobbying incident.
Before offering an apology over his staff member’s behavior, King should engage in self-reflection and ponder his own violations of the principle of neutrality.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as