China is subverting the “status quo” in the South and East China seas, on its border with India and even within the preserve of international riparian flows — all without firing a single shot. Just as it grabbed land across the Himalayas in the 1950s by launching furtive encroachments, China is waging stealth wars against its Asian neighbors that threaten to destabilize the entire region. The more economic power China has amassed, the greater its ambition to alter the territorial “status quo.”
Throughout China’s recent rise from poverty to relative prosperity and global economic power, the fundamentals of its statecraft and strategic doctrine have remained largely unchanged. Since the era of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東), China has adhered to Zhou Dynasty military strategist Sun Tzu’s (孫子) counsel: “subdue the enemy without any battle” by exploiting its weaknesses and camouflaging offense as defense.
“All warfare is based on deception,” Sun famously said.
For more than two decades after former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) consolidated power over the Chinese Communist Party, China pursued a “good neighbor” policy in its relations with other Asian countries, enabling it to concentrate on economic development.
As China accumulated economic and strategic clout, its neighbors benefited from its rapid GDP growth, which spurred their own economies. However, at some point in the past decade, China’s leaders evidently decided that their country’s moment had finally arrived; its “peaceful rise” has since given way to a more assertive approach.
One of the first signs of this shift was China’s revival in 2006 of its long-dormant claim to Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh. In a bid to broaden its “core interests,” China soon began to provoke territorial disputes with several of its neighbors.
Last year, China formally staked a claim under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to more than 80 percent of the South China Sea.
From employing its strong trade position to exploiting its near-monopoly on the global production of vital resources like rare earth minerals, China has staked out a more domineering role in Asia.
In fact, the more openly China has embraced market capitalism, the more nationalist it has become, encouraged by its leaders’ need for an alternative to Marxist dogma as a source of political legitimacy.
Thus, territorial assertiveness has become intertwined with national renewal.
China’s resource-driven stealth wars are becoming a leading cause of geopolitical instability in Asia. The instruments that China uses are diverse, including a new class of stealth warriors reared by paramilitary maritime agencies. And it has already had some victories.
Last year, China effectively took control of the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), an area of the South China Sea that is also claimed by the Philippines and Taiwan, by deploying ships and erecting entry barriers that prohibit Filipino fishermen from accessing their traditional fishing preserve.
China and the Philippines have been locked in a standoff ever since. Now the Philippines is faced with a strategic Hobson’s choice: accept the new Chinese-dictated reality or risk an open war.
China has also launched a stealth war in the East China Sea to assert territorial claims over the resource-rich Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台列嶼), (known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan and the Diaoyu Archipelago in China 釣魚群島), which Japan has controlled since 1895 (aside from a period of administration by the US between 1945 and 1972).
China’s opening gambit — to compel the international community to recognize the existence of a dispute — has been successful, and portends further disturbance of the “status quo.”
Likewise, China has been posing new challenges to India, ratcheting up strategic pressure on multiple flanks, including by reviving old territorial claims.
Given that the countries share the world’s longest disputed land border, India is particularly vulnerable to direct military pressure from China.
The largest territory that China seeks, Arunachal Pradesh, which it claims is part of Tibet, is almost three times the size of Taiwan.
In recent years, China has repeatedly attempted to breach the Himalayan frontier stretching from resource-rich Arunachal Pradesh to the Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir — often successfully, given that the border is vast, inhospitable and difficult to patrol. China’s aim is to needle India — and possibly to push the Line of Actual Control (LAC) southward.
Indeed, on April 15, a platoon of Chinese troops stealthily crossed the LAC at night in the Ladakh region, establishing a camp 19km inside Indian-held territory.
China then embarked on coercive diplomacy, withdrawing its troops only after India destroyed a defensive line of fortifications.
It also handed a lopsided draft agreement that seeks to freeze the belated, bumbling Indian buildup of border defenses, while preserving China’s capability to strike without warning.
India has countered with its own draft accord designed specifically to prevent border flare-ups. However, territory is not the only objective of China’s stealth wars; China is also seeking to disturb the “status quo” when it comes to riparian relations. Indeed, it has almost furtively initiated dam projects to re-engineer cross-border river flows and increase its leverage over its neighbors.
Asian countries — together with the US — should be working to address Asia’s security deficit and establish regional norms. However, China’s approach to statecraft, in which dominance and manipulation trump cooperation, is impeding such efforts. This presents the US, the region’s other leading actor, with a dilemma: watch as China gradually disrupts the “status quo” and weakens the US’ allies and strategic partners.
Or, respond and risk upsetting its relationship with China, the Asian country most integral to its interests. Either choice would have far-reaching consequences.
Against this background, the only way to ensure peace and stability in Asia is to pursue a third option: inducing China to accept the “status quo.” That will require a new brand of statecraft based on mutually beneficial co-operation — not brinkmanship and deception.
Brahma Chellaney is a professor of strategic studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own