China is subverting the “status quo” in the South and East China seas, on its border with India and even within the preserve of international riparian flows — all without firing a single shot. Just as it grabbed land across the Himalayas in the 1950s by launching furtive encroachments, China is waging stealth wars against its Asian neighbors that threaten to destabilize the entire region. The more economic power China has amassed, the greater its ambition to alter the territorial “status quo.”
Throughout China’s recent rise from poverty to relative prosperity and global economic power, the fundamentals of its statecraft and strategic doctrine have remained largely unchanged. Since the era of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東), China has adhered to Zhou Dynasty military strategist Sun Tzu’s (孫子) counsel: “subdue the enemy without any battle” by exploiting its weaknesses and camouflaging offense as defense.
“All warfare is based on deception,” Sun famously said.
For more than two decades after former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) consolidated power over the Chinese Communist Party, China pursued a “good neighbor” policy in its relations with other Asian countries, enabling it to concentrate on economic development.
As China accumulated economic and strategic clout, its neighbors benefited from its rapid GDP growth, which spurred their own economies. However, at some point in the past decade, China’s leaders evidently decided that their country’s moment had finally arrived; its “peaceful rise” has since given way to a more assertive approach.
One of the first signs of this shift was China’s revival in 2006 of its long-dormant claim to Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh. In a bid to broaden its “core interests,” China soon began to provoke territorial disputes with several of its neighbors.
Last year, China formally staked a claim under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to more than 80 percent of the South China Sea.
From employing its strong trade position to exploiting its near-monopoly on the global production of vital resources like rare earth minerals, China has staked out a more domineering role in Asia.
In fact, the more openly China has embraced market capitalism, the more nationalist it has become, encouraged by its leaders’ need for an alternative to Marxist dogma as a source of political legitimacy.
Thus, territorial assertiveness has become intertwined with national renewal.
China’s resource-driven stealth wars are becoming a leading cause of geopolitical instability in Asia. The instruments that China uses are diverse, including a new class of stealth warriors reared by paramilitary maritime agencies. And it has already had some victories.
Last year, China effectively took control of the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), an area of the South China Sea that is also claimed by the Philippines and Taiwan, by deploying ships and erecting entry barriers that prohibit Filipino fishermen from accessing their traditional fishing preserve.
China and the Philippines have been locked in a standoff ever since. Now the Philippines is faced with a strategic Hobson’s choice: accept the new Chinese-dictated reality or risk an open war.
China has also launched a stealth war in the East China Sea to assert territorial claims over the resource-rich Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台列嶼), (known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan and the Diaoyu Archipelago in China 釣魚群島), which Japan has controlled since 1895 (aside from a period of administration by the US between 1945 and 1972).
China’s opening gambit — to compel the international community to recognize the existence of a dispute — has been successful, and portends further disturbance of the “status quo.”
Likewise, China has been posing new challenges to India, ratcheting up strategic pressure on multiple flanks, including by reviving old territorial claims.
Given that the countries share the world’s longest disputed land border, India is particularly vulnerable to direct military pressure from China.
The largest territory that China seeks, Arunachal Pradesh, which it claims is part of Tibet, is almost three times the size of Taiwan.
In recent years, China has repeatedly attempted to breach the Himalayan frontier stretching from resource-rich Arunachal Pradesh to the Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir — often successfully, given that the border is vast, inhospitable and difficult to patrol. China’s aim is to needle India — and possibly to push the Line of Actual Control (LAC) southward.
Indeed, on April 15, a platoon of Chinese troops stealthily crossed the LAC at night in the Ladakh region, establishing a camp 19km inside Indian-held territory.
China then embarked on coercive diplomacy, withdrawing its troops only after India destroyed a defensive line of fortifications.
It also handed a lopsided draft agreement that seeks to freeze the belated, bumbling Indian buildup of border defenses, while preserving China’s capability to strike without warning.
India has countered with its own draft accord designed specifically to prevent border flare-ups. However, territory is not the only objective of China’s stealth wars; China is also seeking to disturb the “status quo” when it comes to riparian relations. Indeed, it has almost furtively initiated dam projects to re-engineer cross-border river flows and increase its leverage over its neighbors.
Asian countries — together with the US — should be working to address Asia’s security deficit and establish regional norms. However, China’s approach to statecraft, in which dominance and manipulation trump cooperation, is impeding such efforts. This presents the US, the region’s other leading actor, with a dilemma: watch as China gradually disrupts the “status quo” and weakens the US’ allies and strategic partners.
Or, respond and risk upsetting its relationship with China, the Asian country most integral to its interests. Either choice would have far-reaching consequences.
Against this background, the only way to ensure peace and stability in Asia is to pursue a third option: inducing China to accept the “status quo.” That will require a new brand of statecraft based on mutually beneficial co-operation — not brinkmanship and deception.
Brahma Chellaney is a professor of strategic studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research.
Many foreigners, particularly Germans, are struck by the efficiency of Taiwan’s administration in routine matters. Driver’s licenses, household registrations and similar procedures are handled swiftly, often decided on the spot, and occasionally even accompanied by preferential treatment. However, this efficiency does not extend to all areas of government. Any foreigner with long-term residency in Taiwan — just like any Taiwanese — would have encountered the opposite: agencies, most notably the police, refusing to accept complaints and sending applicants away at the counter without consideration. This kind of behavior, although less common in other agencies, still occurs far too often. Two cases
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
RSS