For those wanting to travel on a limited budget, there are many working holiday options available. However, one case of a Taiwanese person working abroad has caused quite an upset in Taiwan. The story concerns a university graduate who hurried off to take part in Australia’s working holiday program before he reached the program’s upper age limit of 30. Once there, he did unskilled jobs, with the aim of earning several times the salary he could make in Taiwan. As he says himself, he is basically a Taiwanese migrant worker.
According to a report about him in Business Today, the man stated plainly that he did not travel abroad to gain life experience or to broaden his outlook, but simply to make money.
The most interesting thing about this is that it shows that some people are now identifying themselves as Taiwanese migrant workers. As the graduate says, there were about 600 people working in the same factory, including about 150 from Taiwan.
“Actually, we are Taiwanese laborers,” he says.
His use of the word “we” is no accident. What it shows is that — from the point of view of those working together day in, day out — I see you covered in blood (the factory being a slaughterhouse) and you notice how awkward I feel. As time goes by, the workers share their unspoken predicament and form a kind of class consciousness. What they feel is that “We are Taiwanese workers, we empathize, we share and we encourage one another.”
If Taiwan’s economy goes on as it is, without improving, the emergence of this Taiwanese laborer consciousness and identity will spur a similar awareness among Taiwanese youth who feel that they have no future. As an Indonesian migrant worker — who is qualified to be a teacher — once said to me, the biggest psychological obstacle she faces is how to make herself accept that she is a laborer.
In fact, the phrase “Taiwanese laborer” was heard back when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was president. The opposition accused Chen of ruining the economy and said that Taiwanese would soon have to become migrant workers. In fact, however, the phenomenon of “Taiwanese laborers” did not come to pass when Chen was in office.
Times have changed. According to figures made available by the Australian representative office in Taipei, the number of temporary work permits issued to Taiwanese increased from 9,000 for the whole of 2008 to more than 10,000 for the first half of last year — probably the fastest increase for any country in the world.
Although the number of Taiwanese migrant workers is growing quickly, that does not mean that there are very many of them yet. However, the dismal state of the economy under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is all too obvious. Salaries have shrunk to the same level they were 14 years ago and Taiwan’s economic growth rate is one of the lowest in Asia. Taiwan has the highest unemployment rate of the four “Asian Tiger” economies and a “blue light” indicator — signaling economic contraction — has been flashing for nine months in a row. Notably, Taiwan ranks second from bottom in the world for attracting foreign direct investment and since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) returned to government in 2008, the outflow of listed investment capital to China has sped up — an accumulated outflow of NT$600 billion (US$20.44 billion) so far.
As capital gushes from Taiwan to China, Taiwan straggles behind in attracting overseas investment. Without investment, there can be no job opportunities, so young Taiwanese will unavoidably be forced to see themselves as “Taiwanese laborers.” Ma has already set his legacy — he will long be remembered as the father of Taiwanese migrant workers.
Christian Fan Jiang is deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then