US beef containing traces of ractopamine — a drug that is likely to cause chronic health hazards in the long run — will soon be imported to Taiwan. Unless a deadly case of acute toxicity is suddenly reported in Taiwan, food safety will soon be threatened, despite President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) claims that people will be safe if they do not buy or eat it.
Ractopamine poses four types of health risk to humans. First, it can cause heart palpitations. It might cause cardiac hypertrophy, heart arrhythmia and even heart failure. It can also be fatal in healthy adults without a history of heart disease.
Second, it can cause increased levels of blood sugar.
Third, it can cause a decrease of potassium ions. For patients with kidney diseases who are incapable of balancing electrolytes and must have regular dialysis, this would mean extended periods of dialysis and their disease could worsen.
Fourth, because the liver in babies under 18 months old is unable to produce enzymes to metabolize ractopamine, the drug would remain in their livers and kidneys, becoming dangerous to their health.
Ma said it would be impossible for Taiwan to join the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership (TPP) if the US does not resume bilateral talks on the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA). The implication is that these talks would not be resumed if Taipei does not relax the ban on beef containing ractopamine residues.
It is hard to estimate the benefits that a TPP would bring to Taiwanese, but what we can be certain of is that the public as a whole will suffer from poor health and this will be a great setback to the nation.
It will be a setback because once a new amendment is passed, ractopamine will no longer be a banned substance and this will bring chaos to Taiwan’s high-quality meat market. Cattle and pig farmers will not have to work as hard as they did before and they will be able to use ractopamine to cut costs. Not only will those pig farmers already using ractopamine continue to do so, other pig farmers will also start using it.
The next setback is that although we know that meat might contain ractopamine, we will still have to eat it. This is because it will be cheaper and because everything is increasing in price while salaries remain stagnant, we will be unable to purchase more expensive and safer meat products.
An even greater setback will be that only people of economic means, which allows them to access safe meat products, will be able to enjoy meat free of ractopamine. When this happens, eating safe meat products will become a special privilege of the bourgeoisie.
Basic human needs such as physical health and food safety will become new social issues, accelerating the arrival of an “M-shaped society” — a polarized society with extremes of rich and poor.
Over a decade ago, when social movements became very popular, I took to the streets. On April 1 this year, I took my children to Taipei to take part in a demonstration about food safety. I did this to emphasize the basic need of having safe food to eat.
On the Web site of global pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly & Co the company talks about how honesty, fairness and respect for others are its core values.
Honesty, fairness and respect for others?
These are just the big words that pharmaceutical companies and politicians use to package the profits they make from the public.
Chang Ming-chun is an executive committee member of the Taichung branch of the Homemakers United Foundation.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Drew Cameron
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS