April 1998
Iran joins nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT).
August 2002
The rebel group National Council for Resistance in Iran reveals the existence of undeclared nuclear sites, including an enrichment plant in Natanz and a heavy-water production plant in Arak. Iran acknowledges existence of the sites and asks the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to inspect them.
June 2003
The IAEA rebukes Iran for not declaring the plant, but does not find it in violation of the NPT.
October 2003
Iran agrees to suspend uranium enrichment and to allow a regime of unannounced IAEA inspections.
September 2005
The IAEA finds Iran in non-compliance with the NPT, because of failure to report its nuclear activities.
December 2005
The US Security Council imposes the first set of sanctions on Iran for its refusal to accept a resolution calling for a suspension of enrichment.
January 2006
Iran breaks the IAEA seals on the Natanz plant and other nuclear sites.
February 2006
The IAEA reports Iran to the UN Security Council for non-compliance.
December 2006
The UN imposes its first round of sanctions, resolution 1737, which called on states to block Iran’s import and export of “sensitive nuclear material.”
December 2007
A US national intelligence estimate concludes that Iran had stopped its weapons development program in 2003.
September 2009
US President Barack Obama, then-UK prime minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy announce that their intelligence agencies have found a new Iranian enrichment plant dug into the side of a mountain near Qom, at a site called Fordow. Iran had revealed its existence to the IAEA days earlier, but Western officials say that was because it knew it had been discovered.
October 2009
An apparent breakthrough at a meeting in Geneva, in which Iran agreed to export 1,200kg of its low-enrichment uranium, 75 percent of the total, in return for foreign-made, 20 percent-enriched fuel rods for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). The deal breaks down three weeks later in Vienna.
February 2010
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announces that Iran has made its own 20 percent-enriched uranium
May 2010
Brazil and Turkey broker a deal on the TRR fuel swap along the same lines as the Geneva proposal. However, the US and its allies reject the deal as too late, in view of Iran’s nuclear progress since Geneva.
January 2011
An attempt to restart international negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program breaks down in Istanbul.
November 2011
The IAEA issues a report citing extensive evidence of past work on nuclear weapons, confirming that Iran had tripled its production of 20 percent uranium and made the underground Fordow site fully operational.
January-February 2012
IAEA inspectors visit Tehran to investigate evidence pointing to a past weapons program, but say they did not receive sufficient co-operation.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS