The Child Welfare League Committee is worried that young people are becoming addicted to cellphones. While the committee’s concern is laudable, it’s probably too late to worry about young people becoming addicted, given the behavior of their elder siblings and parents. Instead, society as a whole should question the ubiquitous presence and use of cellphones, even where they have been banned by law, and come up with rules of usage and decorum — even if the nation’s economy is somewhat dependent upon the production and sale of such devices.
The committee conducted a survey that found cellphone usage among urban children had grown 22 percent compared with six years ago, with more than half of fifth and sixth-graders using cellphones, 69.1 percent of seventh-graders and 71.5 percent of eighth-graders. The good news from the league’s survey is that children are using their phones for almost everything but talking. Almost 60 percent of respondents said they spend less than five minutes a day talking on their cellphones. Instead they use them to text their friends, listen to music, take photographs or videos and play online games.
The committee is not pushing for a ban on use at school, but for parents to give their children basic cellphones, not fancy smartphones, as well as setting usage rules and monitoring their children’s use of the phones.
The Taiwan Electromagnetic Radiation Hazard Protection and Control Association (TEPCA) is more concerned about the risk posed by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and the link to cancer, which is why it has been monitoring cellphone use by children. In June, it urged the government to ban children under the age of 15 from using cellphones on school grounds after a WHO warning that there might be a link between cellphone use and brain cancer among frequent users. However, as the WHO report defined “heavy use” as 30 minutes a day over a 10-year period, many people in Taiwan, not just children, are already at risk.
The league and the TEPCA might get their message across more effectively if they could get parents to monitor their own cellphone usage, and teach by example.
How many times have you seen parents or other adults sit down at a restaurant table, lay their cellphones next to their plate — and then proceed to answer or make calls, or take photographs of the food throughout their meal? How many times have we seen a man (and yes, it’s predominantly men) walking down the street with two or more cellphones attached to his belt and another in his hand?
Whatever happened to the law that it is illegal to drive while talking on a handset? When is the last time it was enforced? Hardly a day goes by that you don’t see a driver blocking traffic because he or she is trying to negotiate a turn with one hand on the wheel while trying to talk on a cellphone — or motorcyclists with a cellphone wedged under their helmet so they don’t miss a call.
It is time that lawmakers reviewed the laws covering cellphone use by motorists, to increase both the enforcement of the law and penalties for breaking it, as well as expanding it to include texting while driving.
The US and some other countries are even mulling the possibility of banning the use of hand-free sets, saying that they are too much of a distraction for the average driver. While that may prove too extreme for Taiwan, it is at least worthy of debate in the legislature.
Cellphones are here to stay. A little common sense goes a long way to ensuring that their use does not interfere with others or put people’s lives at risk.
Unfortunately for those who lack common sense, there is no app for that — yet.
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on