Ly Mom has been driven out of her lifelong home in Cambodia’s fast-growing capital. Like thousands of other Cambodians forcibly evicted by the authorities, she is homeless, jobless and angry.
Her grocery store on the banks of Phnom Penh’s Boeng Kak Lake is being bulldozed to make way for a luxury housing estate to be built by a Chinese developer and a well-connected Cambodian tycoon.
“People living here have nothing apart from their bare hands,” she said. “They have been given no choice.”
Ly Mom’s story is the flipside of a “no strings” Chinese investment boom that Cambodia’s government says will transform its underdeveloped US$10 billion economy and improve living standards for millions of impoverished people.
A total of 2,752 families have already been driven from their homes around Boeng Kak.
Ly Mom’s family is one of 1,500 refusing to budge, protesting each day and rejecting the developer’s compensation of just US$8,500, or relocation to a small apartment on the fringes of the sprawling city. Their latest demand is for 64m2 of lake land to be left for each family.
But no one is listening to them. Similar protests are held every week in Cambodia as families with no title deeds are told to pack their bags.
Experts warn that Cambodia’s government could one day have a rebellion on its hands.
“The long-range economic costs to a country’s development impact ultimately on the welfare of the people,” said Donald Weatherbee, an expert on Southeast Asian politics at the University of South Carolina.
“The political costs? Well, look at Egypt or Libya,” he said.
The luxury housing project is led by China’s Inner Mongolia Erdos Hongjun Investment Corp, which has pledged to spend US$3 billion in Cambodia on real estate, metal processing and power generation.
China is Cambodia’s biggest source of foreign direct investment (FDI). Beijing plans to spend US$8 billion in 360 projects in the first seven months of this year — the same amount it invested in the whole of Southeast Asia in 2008.
China is also Cambodia’s -largest source of foreign aid, providing about US$600 million in 2007 and US$260 million in 2008.
However, as Chinese, Vietnamese, South Korean and local businesses snap up lucrative concessions and real estate, farmers are being evicted and entire villages shifted to make way for mining, agriculture and hydropower projects.
Rights groups and donor countries are concerned and have threatened to withhold much-needed aid to one of Asia’s poorest countries, home to 14 million people and sandwiched between larger neighbors Thailand and Vietnam.
The evictions have risen as Beijing cozies up to its cash-strapped and underdeveloped ally and strengthens a relationship that analysts say has the US concerned about China’s expanding influence in Southeast Asia.
According to Housing Rights Task Force, a Cambodian group monitoring forced evictions, 30,000 people were moved off their land last year, up from 27,000 in 2009. An estimated 150,000 more evictions are expected in the next few years, 70,000 to 80,000 in Phnom Penh alone.
World Bank president Robert Zoellick recently said he was “deeply troubled” by the Boeng Kak evictions and offered financing and expert advice to the government.
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has not responded. In several speeches he has expressed a clear preference for Chinese investment, because it comes without conditions, unlike Western nations that relentlessly prod his government to carry out democratic reforms and improve its dismal record on human rights and corruption.
“China’s investments have few strings attached,” Cambodian political analyst Chea Vannath said. “China’s push for more power and influence works very well with Cambodia, because it needs a cash injection into its economy and infrastructure.”
Most Cambodians who have been forcibly evicted are unable to prove ownership of land and property because legal documents were destroyed during the Khmer Rouge’s brutal 1970s “Year Zero” revolution that killed about 1.7 million people.
Weatherbee said the evictions could one day lead to a groundswell of public discontent over what he calls “crony capitalism” between Cambodian elites and Chinese firms.
“For the people, the short term economic gains seem offset by the disruptions of human displacement, environmental disaster and political oppression,” he said.
Growth and development seems to be Cambodia’s priority. Trade with China climbed 42.1 percent last year to US$1.12 billion. During Hun Sen’s visit last year to Beijing, China promised a US$300 million loan to build two national roads and an irrigation project. Other deals worth about US$293 million, mostly infrastructure-related, were also agreed.
Chinese has so far invested just more than US$1 billion in Cambodia — a figure dwarfed by huge investment pledges over the next five years. Total Chinese FDI in other Southeast Asian economies, up to the end of 2009, included US$799 million in Indonesia, US$448 million in Thailand and US$728 million in Vietnam, official Chinese figures showed.
Analysts say the arrangement with Cambodia has been designed to go beyond business. China will be assured of Cambodia’s political support, while Beijing’s veto as a permanent member of the UN Security Council could offer Cambodia some international protection, as it has the military generals that run Myanmar, who are also key allies of China.
Cambodia showed its unwavering support for China in December 2009 by defying international pressure and deporting 20 Muslim Uighurs who sought asylum after fleeing ethnic violence in China. Two days later, Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) visited Phnom Penh and signed 14 trade deals worth US$850 million.
Following a recent visit to Beijing, Cambodian Foreign Minister Hor Namhong made his country’s stance clear.
“It’s a good thing that China, as the rising superpower, contributes to solve the world’s problems,” he said.
“Should we rather accept Chinese tourists who spend money in our country, or Chinese refugees?” he said.
Similar patterns of Chinese investment are being seen in Myanmar and Communist Laos as Beijing splashes its cash and boosts its presence in Southeast Asia.
China is planning to pour money into rail and road projects to increase trade, investment and tourism in the region, underscoring strengthening ties with the 10-member ASEAN, with which it has agreed a free-trade pact covering an area with a combined population of 1.9 billion people and GDP of nearly US$6 trillion.
For people like Ly Mom, China’s interest in Cambodia has left a sour taste and protests are increasingly common.
Strict laws were passed in 2009 to restrict demonstrations, which rights groups and experts saw as a pre-emptive strike by Hun Sen’s government, aware it could have problems on its hands.
Housing Rights Task Force director Sia Phearum, said that if the rights of ordinary Cambodians were ignored, the result would be instability and eventual upheaval.
“The future is that there will be more serious human rights violations, and unrest like in the Arab countries,” Sia Phearum said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY BEN BLANCHARD
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS