Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was US President Barack Obama’s first official state visitor. India was an early stop in the travels of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was in India just last month to talk with his counterparts. Admiral Robert Willard went to meet with India’s political and military leaders in New Delhi only six weeks after taking charge of the Pacific Command based in Hawaii.
For Lieutenant General Benjamin Mixon, commander of the US Army Pacific, contacts with Indian Army leaders are a top priority; he traveled there last fall. At the same time, Lieutenant-Colonel James Isenhower, a battalion commander in the 25th Infantry Division in Schofield Barracks near Honolulu, led 300 soldiers with 17 Stryker combat vehicles airlifted to India for training. And Major Aljone Lopes, a specialist on South Asia, spends his waking hours at Honolulu’s Fort Shafter in staff support of the effort to foster military links with India. That the US has put on a full-court press to cultivate India is thus evident.
Gates told the press in New Delhi: “I continue to be impressed by our increased cooperation, cooperation that would have been unimaginable even a few years ago.”
He said India and the US “continue to look for areas to expand our engagement.”
The reasons, say diplomats and military officers experienced in South Asia, are clear:
• India is a rising democratic power that has shucked the constraints of the Cold War, notably its affiliation with the so-called non-aligned movement and reliance on the Soviet Union for military and economic aid.
• Even though Indian and US political leaders profess in public not to seek to contain China, India is seen as a counterweight to an emerging and sometimes belligerent China.
• India has become receptive to US overtures because good relations with the US could give New Delhi the wider access to the international stage that it craves.
• Nascent relations with the US give the expanding Indian economy access to US technology, business methods and investment.
• India has been looking for a new source of military equipment since Russia, with industrial problems after the breakup of the Soviet Union, has become unreliable. India imports about 70 percent of its military materiel.
• With Pakistan increasingly troubled and faltering in the struggle against terror, India has become a more likely strategic partner for the US. No longer does the US deal even-handedly with the two rivals.
• The Indian-American population in the US has grown, in large measure become economically comfortable or even wealthy, and has learned how to influence the nation’s politics, to include lobbying in Washington.
Military relations are essential to this embryonic partnership. The soldiers led by commander Isenhower spent a month in India, most of it in hard training. Once the initial individual and small unit instruction had been completed, the Indians and Americans swapped units. A US platoon was integrated into an Indian company and an Indian platoon joined a US company.
The Indian government asked the US Army to bring the Strykers, which are relatively new but have earned a good reputation in Iraq. The lightly armored vehicle comes in several versions, one being an infantry troop carrier and another armed, like some tanks, with a 105mm gun. Presumably, the Indians wanted to compare the Strykers with the Soviet infantry vehicle with which they have been equipped.
Since most Indian officers spoke English, communication with Americans was easy. With Indian sergeants and soldiers, the Americans relied on arm and hand signals, which worked reasonably well. Beyond that, the soldiers depended on their common experience.
As Major Lopes, the specialist on South Asia, said: “A soldier is a soldier is a soldier.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS