When Egypt’s government banned Islamic veils and all-encompassing robes in the dorms of public universities, it cited reports of men wearing the garb to sneak into the women’s quarters.
There was, however, a deeper reason behind the move — an intensifying struggle between the moderate Islam championed by the state and a populace that is turning to a stricter version of the faith, whose most visible hallmark is the niqab, a dress that covers the entire female form, including the face.
The debate has grown more heated since Mohammad Tantawi, the top cleric at prestigious Al-Azhar University, banned the niqab in classrooms and dorms on grounds that it “has nothing to do with Islam” and that it was unnecessary since the college is gender-segregated. Meanwhile, the Health Ministry and religious authorities forbade nurses and preachers to wear the niqab.
The moves have angered many women who say they cover up voluntarily out of religious conviction, and in some cases are penalized for it.
Fatma al-Assal, 22, has just earned her veterinary degree and says she has already been refused a teaching job. She refuses to back down.
“Al-Azhar has no authority over me,” she said.
Like her mother and two younger sisters, she covers everything including her hands.
Dressed that way, “I feel respect. I don’t have anyone looking at me,” she said. “Islam says all the woman’s body is a temptation.”
She said she takes her example from what many Muslims believe was the dress code in the time of Mohammed, who founded their religion nearly 1,400 years ago.
“I want to emulate the wives of the prophet,” she said.
In European countries, particularly France, the debate over women’s dress has turned on questions of how to integrate immigrants and balance a minority’s rights with secular opinion that the garb is an affront to women.
In Egypt, however, the dynamic is different. Here, public conservatism is at odds with a government that is viewed not only as secular, but as autocratic, corrupt and uncaring.
The debate underscores the gulf between the more secular elite that wields economic and political power, and the largely impoverished and disenfranchised masses who increasingly find solace in religion.
The split was evident last month, when billboards of Beyonce wearing a swimsuit were plastered all over Cairo to advertise the US singer’s concert at Egypt’s most exclusive beach resort, which the vast majority of Egyptians could not afford to attend.
One conservative lawmaker branded it an “insolent sex party.”
Another called for banning the “nudity concert,” and an anti-concert petition on Facebook gathered 10,000 supporters. The concert went ahead without incident in the remote resort under heavy security protection.
A decade ago, the niqab was almost never seen in Egypt and it is still a minority fashion. Most women wear a scarf that covers the hair but not the face, often with tight jeans or clinging tops, despite clerics’ complaints that formfitting clothes violate the whole point of “Islamic dress.”
Today it is normal to see women in a niqab, hidden under a veil that covers everything but the eyes, billowing black robes that cloak the body’s shape and often gloves. They are found at universities, teaching in schools, working in government offices and private companies, strolling along the Nile and riding on motorcycles behind their husbands.
The inspiration is Salafism, a movement that models itself on early Islam. Its doctrine is similar to Saudi Arabia’s and many trace its spread to Egyptians returning home from work in the kingdom and to Saudi-backed religious satellite TV stations.
Salafi groups are nonpolitical and shun the violent teachings that drove Egypt’s Islamic insurgency in the 1990s. Still, they provide financial, medical and charity services that are an attractive alternative to the state’s poor services. Moreover, Salafi ideology, including the wearing of the niqab, increasingly is attracting more affluent followers.
That has the government fearing a loss of control.
“This is not a security battle. It is a cultural, political battle,” said Diaa Rashwan, an analyst who monitors such groups. “There is no cohesion within the state on how to tackle it.”
For some women, particularly the young, covering up is an implicit rebellion against the system and despite the West’s notion of Muslim women being oppressed and cloistered, many of them are outspoken in defending their beliefs.
“I tell a girl who wants to wear the niqab that she has to be ready to fight for it,” said al-Assal’s mother, Iman el-Shewihi, who veiled herself 15 years ago — the first in her family to do so.
The 45-year-old woman, who is working on her doctorate in Islamic law, says that like her daughter, she has paid a price. She has been denied teaching jobs at her university in Tanta, north of Cairo.
The wearing of veils has spread in other secular-leaning Arab countries such as Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, but today Egypt, which used to be the Arab world’s wellspring of secular thinking and lifestyle, is considered much more conservative than the others. It is also the only country actively trying to curb the veil, although Jordan’s government tries to discourage it by playing up reports of robbers who wear veils as masks.
In addition to the Education Ministry’s order for dormitories, some public universities have barred the veil during examinations, saying that male students sometimes disguise themselves in the garb to take tests for female friends.
Tantawi stirred a furor with his niqab ban in October. Besides the university, Al-Azhar runs a network of religion-based secondary schools separate from the public system.
He won backing from state media run by pro-government liberal businessmen, which depicted the veil as a sign of spreading extremism.
“There has to be a firm stand on this,” said Abdullah Kamal, a ruling party member and editor-in-chief of Rose Al-Youssef, a government-funded newspaper.
Some job postings on the Internet explicitly rule out veiled women, and many social clubs and glitzy restaurants bar them.
Tantawi was accused by a cleric on a TV talk show of “participating in a crusade against Islam,” and there were demands for his resignation. He has since tried do damage-control, insisting in interviews that he respects the niqab, but his prohibition stands.
A group of women, backed by human rights groups, is suing the government for denying them subsidized housing in the dorms.
One of them is Iman, a veiled medical student who joined other women in street protests and says she was roughed up by security agents. She spoke on condition of anonymity, fearing further government harassment.
She said five of her colleagues shed their veils so they could live in the dorms and her father, a farmer, is pressing her to do the same, but she has chosen to keep her veil and rent an apartment, even though it costs three times as much as a dorm.
“I don’t need them anymore,” she said of the government. “They will not be able to break me.”
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS