The joint statement issued by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and US President Barack Obama on Nov. 17 was cause for concern. Taiwan was further marginalized in the triangle of relations between Taiwan, the US and China and is now in an unprecedented predicament. Taiwan must amend the Referendum Act (公民投票法) to state that “cross-strait agreements shall be decided by public referendum.”
That is the only way for a united Taiwan to deal with the enormous pressure for political talks this nation can now expect from Hu.
The joint statement did not mention the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) — which governs Washington’s Taiwan policy — but did mention the three Sino-US joint communiques.
territorial integrity
The statement also treated China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as the core of the three communiques and changed Washington’s “one China policy” into a “one China principle.”
Obama even publicly supported Hu’s request for Taiwan to start cross-strait political talks soon.
The US’ promises to Taiwan weakened and Washington violated its 1982 “six assurances” to Taiwan by endorsing cross-strait political talks.
With Obama’s endorsement, Hu is expected to pile on the pressure to achieve his dream of creating an irreversible framework for unification before he steps down in 2012.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government have said Taiwan will sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China in March, even though its contents remain unclear.
COMING SOON?
Hu said recently that Taiwan cannot avoid political negotiations with China, meaning that such talks are likely to be on the table soon after an ECFA is inked.
Judging from his sophistication and deviousness, Hu will ask that Taiwan make a commitment during the signing process to pave the way for political talks and an agenda for a possible Ma-Hu meeting in 2011.
Just a week before the Hu-Obama meeting, China sent a large delegation of academics to Taiwan.
Their tough stance on unification indicates that Beijing was aware of Washington’s support for cross-strait political talks in advance. In the face of both the former’s oppression and the latter’s push, Taipei is facing a crisis: Political talks seem inevitable.
The situation today is even more critical than it was in 1979, when the US established diplomatic ties with the People’s Republic of China.
The US and China are now cooperating to lead Taiwan to the slaughter.
The only solution is to strengthen the nation’s democratic mechanisms as soon as possible and give the public substantial power to decide its future.
PIVOTAL POINT
This is a pivotal moment. Taiwan must amend the Referendum Act and build a consensus on the need for cross-strait decisions to be made by the public through plebiscites.
Referendums on this would endow the public with a right that reaches beyond the blue-green divide to have their say on the nation’s future.
They would also be an effective tool to unite the public and build a domestic consensus on crucial matters.
If Taiwan does not amend the Referendum Act and put cross-strait agreements to referendums, it will find itself squeezed between China and the US into a difficult and irreversible situation.
Lai I-chung is an executive member of Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS