On Wednesday, central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) met ranking officials from three state-run banks and asked them to pay attention to the ability of borrowers to repay loans, not just admire the value of the collateral.
The central bank’s unusual move came just three weeks after it issued a press statement voicing concerns that an inflow of hot money would have adverse implications for the nation’s economic and financial stability.
It also came after the central bank increased sales of negotiable certificates of deposit and certificates of deposit to drain excess funds from the money market.
While the central bank declined to comment on whether the housing market is overheating, the perception in financial circles is that the central bank is using open-market operations to fend off a potential property bubble.
Coincidently, the Council for Economic Planning and Development last week invited academics to discuss ways of curbing the rise in house prices. Elsewhere, several government officials have expressed concern over the worsening problem of housing unaffordability.
An asset bubble is doomed to take place in Taiwan, as well as in other economies, after interest rates were cut over the past year to support slowing economies amid the global financial crisis. With interest rates so low, financial regulators now face a surging capital inflow and rising asset prices.
In recent weeks, governments including Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea and India have adopted measures to prevent their domestic property markets from presenting bubble symptoms.
Experience suggests, however, that the limits of those measures will soon be reached, and that interest rate hikes will be the next step. A key question for central banks is how quickly they should act.
One concern is that raising rates too early might stall economic recovery in those Asian economies where signs of sustainable growth are yet to emerge.
Another concern is that, as risk appetite begins to build in Asia along with the rebounding economy, a quick rate hike would likely boost the so-called “carry trade” — in which investors borrow from countries with ultra-low interest rates and invest in countries with higher rates — thus aggravating what we have already seen in Asia with price surges in equities, real estate and other assets.
In its latest economic outlook for Asia released on Thursday, the IMF said that striking a balance between growth and inflation would be one of the three major policy challenges for Asian economies this year and next year.
Even so, the problem of excess funds in the money market is the most compelling issue for Asian economies, including Taiwan, at this time.
Rather than use credit-tightening measures to quietly discourage speculative financial transactions, governments might consider whether directing surplus capital into sectors that can generate real production — as opposed to financial investment in equities, real estate and commodities — is a wiser approach.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS