Oct. 12 is Columbus Day in the US, a national holiday. On that day and the preceding couple of days, celebrations are held across the country to commemorate white Europeans’ “discovery” of the New World, which actually means occupation and colonization.
On the campus of New Mexico State University, where I am visiting, a group of people, mainly local Native American students, also had a celebration. What they were celebrating, however, was not Columbus Day, but Native American Day, marking Indigenous people’s maintenance of their unique social and cultural traditions after more than 500 years of occupation. They also submitted a petition to the school administration, asking it to recognize and value Native American Day rather than celebrating and publicizing Columbus Day.
The occupiers’ celebration of their ancestors’ arrival on the continent is an affront to Indigenous people, whose ancestors — the original masters of the land — were slaughtered, had their land seized and were forced to change their religion and abandon their culture.
One example is the Pueblo tribe, whose members live in New Mexico. Before the white Europeans arrived, the Pueblo numbered approximately 50,000 people, but their population declined to little more than 10,000 a century later. Some were killed by Europeans and more died of diseases brought by the colonialists.
Through no fault of their own, Indigenous people suffered greatly from the onslaught of the “white peril.”
In the past, the white occupiers often rationalized their colonization of the American continent on the grounds that they were the bringers of civilization, but it is arguable who really was more civilized — the settlers or the natives.
When the Spanish first came to New Mexico, they brought not only massacres and disease, but also the backward European feudal system. They imposed massive levies on Aborigines’ land and crops, taking them as tribute.
The settlers’ extreme monotheistic religion — Catholicism — had no tolerance for any other form of religious beliefs. As a result, many followers of traditional Indigenous faiths were put to death under the banner of religion, mirroring the notorious Spanish Inquisition.
Before the arrival of Europeans, the Pueblo natives of what is now the southwestern US had already developed a highly complex social organization with advanced architecture, art and culture, and they did not have such a backward and unequal class system as was dominant in Europe at the time.
The highly civilized Indigenous people repeatedly resisted the white colonists’ hegemonic and backward rule. In 1680 they launched the first successful, though brief, revolution in the Americas, driving out the Spaniards.
Thereafter they constantly resisted the returning Spanish and later Mexican and US forces.
As they fought bravely again and again, they built an unshakeable society and culture, full of confidence despite their small population.
On what white Europeans call Columbus Day, the Pueblo insist that the occupiers should not commemorate the beginning of their occupation on land soaked with the blood of the ancestors of the occupied.
Here in Taiwan, some of the majority Han people celebrate “glorious October,” including the Republic of China’s “Double Ten” National Day and Retrocession Day on Oct. 25. Do they, too, hear the Pueblos’ call?
Chi Chun-chieh is a visiting professor at New Mexico State University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS