The Taipei District Court recently summoned former Far Eastern Transport Corp (遠東航空) chairman Stephen Tsuei (崔湧) over breach of trust allegations. But Tsuei did not show up at court, and because he did not report to his local police station as bail conditions required, he is now considered to have jumped bail.
There have been several other individuals accused of economic crimes who absconded during investigations, during court proceedings or before the verdict was handed down.
Most infamously, Rebar Asia Pacific Group (力霸亞太企業集團) chairman Wang You-theng (王又曾) left Taiwan before his case came to court and while he was applying to restructure his company.
Those accused of serious economic crimes can be tempted to flee the country. The authorities would do well to place this category of suspect in custody or dispatch security for 24-hour surveillance, as in the cases of former Procomp Informatics Co chairwoman Sophie Yeh (葉素菲) and Eastern Multimedia Group chairman Gary Wang (王令麟).
Although the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates that people suspected of committing serious crimes be placed in custody; media commentators and politicians frequently question the decisions of judges when they order this. Judges are, after all, human beings; it is hard to guarantee that powerful individuals will not be able to influence their work in all cases.
In March, the legislature passed the Enforcement Law for the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (公民與政治權利國際公約、經濟社會文化權利國際公約施行法), which means that more attention will be paid to human rights when issuing verdicts that involve suspects in custody.
The Ministry of Justice has formulated guidelines to prevent such individuals from escaping.
But according to training materials from the FBI, as many as 12 people can be needed to carry out adequate, around-the-clock surveillance of an individual, and that more than 12 might be needed for surveillance and covert intelligence-gathering.
Depending on the seriousness of the alleged crime, several years can elapse between the initial stages of a criminal investigation and the delivery of a final verdict.
It is therefore very difficult to imagine how the police or the ministry’s Investigation Bureau could meet such huge demands on their personnel.
Even if the authorities spare no expense in their investigations, it is hard to believe that these efforts would bring about substantial results in many cases.
Justice delayed is justice denied. Even if we sign extradition treaties with other nations, pursuing and capturing a suspect implicated in serious economic criminal activity is dependent on whether the country to which the suspect flees has the ability to capture him.
To prevent such criminal suspects from escaping, the judiciary should consider borrowing from the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act (性侵害犯罪防治法) and authorize electronic shackles.
This would not only advance the nation’s human rights credentials by reducing the number of suspects in preventative custody, it would also avoid wasting judicial resources and reduce the burden on the judiciary and the police.
Dan Chan is an associate professor at the Department and Graduate Institute of Criminology at National Chung Cheng University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS