The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), more than 100 years old, and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), a youthful 23, have different cultures. The DPP is like an inverted whirlpool in which one must publicly demonstrate one’s abilities to reach the top.
The KMT, however, is a deep body of water with unpredictable currents: Everything looks calm on the surface, but under this perpetual cover of solidarity, scheming and power struggles are a constant.
After the May 17 anti-government demonstration, supporters of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) did not want to disperse, instead holding up placards and shouting slogans in a direct challenge to DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) leadership. Tsai said she would fight for Chen’s judicial rights and not abandon his supporters, but she ignored their other demands in announcing an end to the protest. It was a typical example of a DPP power play.
Meanwhile, in the tussle for the leadership of the KMT, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) refuses to say whether he wants to double as party chairman despite ongoing calls for him to do so.
Yet it is all but certain that he will become chairman. Incumbent Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) has not withdrawn his bid for another term, but in the face of defeat, his focus is turning to the best alternative.
There is speculation, for example, that Wu will eventually replace Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), who recently had malignant tumors operated on, but Wu would additionally be expecting an honorary chairmanship of his party, like that awarded to former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰).
Wu also needs to consider the political future of his son, Wu Chih-yang (吳志揚), whose failure to attract the support of KMT Deputy Chairman Chu Li-lun (朱立倫) — now organizing the nominees for his successor as Taoyuan County commissioner — has come as a setback.
The situation is such that a single misstep may irrevocably damage Wu Poh-hsiung’s agenda.
For Ma and Wu, the struggle for the chairmanship has added resonance. Wu has always supported Ma — as Taipei mayor, as KMT chairman and now as president. His great hopes for Ma over the years have now turned into a rivalry, and Wu can no longer expect Ma to repay his support in kind.
Ma is intent on securing the chairmanship to better control the party and the government, and to bring this about he must first “deal” with Wu Poh-hsiung in a way that neutralizes his influence while saving his face. Determining which political post would be appropriate for him and what conditions would satisfy him will be a test for Ma’s political acumen. The two men have always supported one another, but that they are seen to be haggling over the party chairmanship proves once again that there are no eternal friends or enemies in politics.
When politicians in a healthy democracy step down, they simply pack up and leave, and unless the government offers an overseas posting or other safety net, they are left to fend for themselves.
Not so in KMT political culture: With the KMT, politics is a lifetime occupation. Regardless of age or experience, senior politicians who step down must be given a prestigious-sounding position and be treated with pomp and fanfare to avoid the party-wide backlash that would result from the spurning of a colleague and his supporters.
Little wonder that KMT honorary chairmanships are growing in number — and with these the packing of more skeletons into the closet.
Although a new generation of leaders is emerging in the KMT, the older generation simply will not disappear.
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and