Dragon Boat Festival was originally a day to dispel disease in the summer.
But after poet Qu Yuan (屈原) of the ancient kingdom of Chu was said to have thrown himself into a river on the day more than 2,000 years ago, it turned into a holiday to commemorate him. Today, Lunar New Year, Dragon Boat Festival and Moon Festival are all important holidays in Chinese culture.
But is Qu’s suicide the kind of behavior that should be encouraged? And what does Qu have to do with Taiwan?
Former South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun committed suicide on May 23 to protect his name. In Taipei, Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) talked about Roh’s suicide in a positive light.
Pan-blue camp politicians and commentators also took the opportunity to mock former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), as if they thought he should commit suicide to salvage his dignity.
Such comments, however, incited strong public condemnation, because talking about suicide as a way of solving a problem or encouraging others to kill themselves may inspire anyone encountering hardships to do so.
Such exhortations show a lack of humanity.
If we should not sympathize with Roh or praise him for committing suicide, then why should we commemorate the day Qu committed suicide and celebrate it as a holiday?
Must we really follow the Chinese tradition of making zongzi — steamed rice dumplings wrapped in bamboo leaves — and hold dragon boat races to commemorate a suicide thousands of years ago by someone completely unrelated to Taiwan? Isn’t that tantamount to encouraging suicide?
If it is not, Taiwan should instead commemorate the pro-independence activist Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), who set himself on fire 20 years ago to defend freedom of expression. We should not hail Deng’s action, but recognize that he felt that he was forced to take such action because of events. Without his sacrifice, Taiwan would be unable to enjoy the freedom of expression and democracy it has today.
Compared with Qu, who killed himself because he was unable to fulfill his wishes, Deng is more deserving of remembrance.
We often say “Taiwan and China, one country on each side.” But we still naively celebrate Chinese holidays and identify ourselves with Chinese culture and China. Small wonder that many Taiwanese refer to themselves as “Chinese” without thinking about it. This is why it is so difficult to build Taiwanese self-awareness.
There is no need for Taiwanese to purposely avoid Chinese holidays if the holidays relate to Taiwan. But there is no value in celebrating holidays with no connection to Taiwan.
It is time for Taiwan to review its national holidays. We should only commemorate people and events related to us instead of blindly following Chinese traditions.
We Taiwanese must follow our own path to build a culture and customs that belong to us.
Kuo Cheng-deng is a doctor.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS