Dragon Boat Festival was originally a day to dispel disease in the summer.
But after poet Qu Yuan (屈原) of the ancient kingdom of Chu was said to have thrown himself into a river on the day more than 2,000 years ago, it turned into a holiday to commemorate him. Today, Lunar New Year, Dragon Boat Festival and Moon Festival are all important holidays in Chinese culture.
But is Qu’s suicide the kind of behavior that should be encouraged? And what does Qu have to do with Taiwan?
Former South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun committed suicide on May 23 to protect his name. In Taipei, Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) talked about Roh’s suicide in a positive light.
Pan-blue camp politicians and commentators also took the opportunity to mock former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), as if they thought he should commit suicide to salvage his dignity.
Such comments, however, incited strong public condemnation, because talking about suicide as a way of solving a problem or encouraging others to kill themselves may inspire anyone encountering hardships to do so.
Such exhortations show a lack of humanity.
If we should not sympathize with Roh or praise him for committing suicide, then why should we commemorate the day Qu committed suicide and celebrate it as a holiday?
Must we really follow the Chinese tradition of making zongzi — steamed rice dumplings wrapped in bamboo leaves — and hold dragon boat races to commemorate a suicide thousands of years ago by someone completely unrelated to Taiwan? Isn’t that tantamount to encouraging suicide?
If it is not, Taiwan should instead commemorate the pro-independence activist Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), who set himself on fire 20 years ago to defend freedom of expression. We should not hail Deng’s action, but recognize that he felt that he was forced to take such action because of events. Without his sacrifice, Taiwan would be unable to enjoy the freedom of expression and democracy it has today.
Compared with Qu, who killed himself because he was unable to fulfill his wishes, Deng is more deserving of remembrance.
We often say “Taiwan and China, one country on each side.” But we still naively celebrate Chinese holidays and identify ourselves with Chinese culture and China. Small wonder that many Taiwanese refer to themselves as “Chinese” without thinking about it. This is why it is so difficult to build Taiwanese self-awareness.
There is no need for Taiwanese to purposely avoid Chinese holidays if the holidays relate to Taiwan. But there is no value in celebrating holidays with no connection to Taiwan.
It is time for Taiwan to review its national holidays. We should only commemorate people and events related to us instead of blindly following Chinese traditions.
We Taiwanese must follow our own path to build a culture and customs that belong to us.
Kuo Cheng-deng is a doctor.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS