Freeway No. 6, dubbed as Taiwan’s first eco-friendly freeway, has opened to traffic.
Engineers have built a “biological corridor” to more closely link the project with the natural environment, incorporating ecological protection techniques in the freeway’s construction and integrating the efforts of people from various sectors.
The freeway is a breakthrough for Taiwanese engineering, and some are suggesting that it can serve as an example for the controversial Suhua Freeway (蘇花高) project.
But this “eco-freeway” faces major challenges.
First, we must ask whether the freeway will stand up to natural disasters. Nantou County has experienced many serious disasters; last year’s Typhoon Sinlaku, for example, caused a massive landslide that toppled two hotels at the Lushan (盧山) Hot Springs Area.
Also, Guosing (國姓), Puli (埔里) and Jenai (仁愛) townships in Nantou County were badly affected by the 921 earthquake a decade ago, with many people losing their property, their homes or their lives.
With Freeway No. 6 costing NT$10 billion (US$294 million) and running through areas that have been wrecked by natural disasters, I would like to believe that the engineers took contingencies such as typhoons, torrential rain, landslides and earthquakes into consideration.
Second, we must ask if the areas around the freeway will stand up to the damage caused by manmade activities. In central Taiwan, the two major rivers are the Dajia (大甲溪) and the Chuoshui (濁水溪), whose catchment areas include a large number of mountain streams. The problem is that illegal gravel collection has been going on for years, with several heads of the Third River Management Office in Taichung County resigning after being charged with gravel theft and corruption. A potentially major geological problem stems from illegal mining in these areas, and this could have been one of the factors behind the collapse of the Houfeng Bridge in Taichung County during Typhoon Sinlaku.
Especially worthy of attention is the fact that Freeway No. 6 has been built high above the ground in river valleys and in hilly areas, which leads one to wonder how activities such as gravel mining may have damaged the surrounding environment and whether this will compromise the safety of the freeway.
Third, we must ask how the freeway will affect the ecology of the environment by the side of the road. Even if all natural and human variables are taken into account when building such a road, no one can guarantee that the freeway will not damage the environment, a problem that is not wished away because the National Freeway Bureau built a number of “ecological zones.” Merely opening the freeway to traffic will bring noise and vibrations to a once-peaceful mountain area. Roads are not natural objects and their presence will have an impact on the local ecology, even when environmental impact assessments state that they will not.
Fourth, we must ask if the freeway will damage the wider environment. The road will bring larger numbers of tourists into the area. Recent media reports have said that more than double the normal amount of tourists have been visiting Puli, Sun Moon Lake (日月潭) and surrounding scenic areas.
Some reports said tourists have complained that they could not find food because of the sharp increase in visitors. It is difficult to guarantee that the environment will not suffer from large amounts of garbage, for example, or that animals and vegetation in surrounding forests will not suffer.
We cannot be concerned only with the potential economic benefits that a freeway can bring. The mountain areas of Nantou possess vast amounts of precious resources. Now that the freeway is open, forest-related development could accelerate, with greater incentives for illegal logging in the region.
Even more importantly, Nantou’s mountain regions have rare species of animals and vegetation that could be damaged by a dramatic increase in the number of tourists and a lack of attention to conservation.
Lastly, we must ask if the freeway will have an effect on the safety and health of local residents. The convenience brought by freeways can bring more crime — such as drug trafficking — into an area and affect local security because of higher mobility.
In addition, when an area is better serviced by transport, infectious diseases that are traditionally regarded as more urban in nature can enter a region at a faster pace. For example, a Japanese academic specializing in Southeast Asian ecology and the environment recently showed that HIV infection rates in areas near Thai borders had risen because of freeways.
Therefore, environmental impact assessments are not sufficient in these cases. An assessment of how a project will influence people should also be conducted.
There is no doubt that Freeway No. 6 will bring tourism and money to the remote scenic and mountainous areas of Nantou and make life and transport more convenient for local residents. However, positive features of remoteness will disappear with the opening of the freeway and increasing numbers of cars and tourists will head to the area. This will not only harm the environment, but also have a negative impact on local residents. We must be vigilant on these issues.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor in the department of political science at the Graduate Institute of Political Economy at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS