Freeway No. 6, dubbed as Taiwan’s first eco-friendly freeway, has opened to traffic.
Engineers have built a “biological corridor” to more closely link the project with the natural environment, incorporating ecological protection techniques in the freeway’s construction and integrating the efforts of people from various sectors.
The freeway is a breakthrough for Taiwanese engineering, and some are suggesting that it can serve as an example for the controversial Suhua Freeway (蘇花高) project.
But this “eco-freeway” faces major challenges.
First, we must ask whether the freeway will stand up to natural disasters. Nantou County has experienced many serious disasters; last year’s Typhoon Sinlaku, for example, caused a massive landslide that toppled two hotels at the Lushan (盧山) Hot Springs Area.
Also, Guosing (國姓), Puli (埔里) and Jenai (仁愛) townships in Nantou County were badly affected by the 921 earthquake a decade ago, with many people losing their property, their homes or their lives.
With Freeway No. 6 costing NT$10 billion (US$294 million) and running through areas that have been wrecked by natural disasters, I would like to believe that the engineers took contingencies such as typhoons, torrential rain, landslides and earthquakes into consideration.
Second, we must ask if the areas around the freeway will stand up to the damage caused by manmade activities. In central Taiwan, the two major rivers are the Dajia (大甲溪) and the Chuoshui (濁水溪), whose catchment areas include a large number of mountain streams. The problem is that illegal gravel collection has been going on for years, with several heads of the Third River Management Office in Taichung County resigning after being charged with gravel theft and corruption. A potentially major geological problem stems from illegal mining in these areas, and this could have been one of the factors behind the collapse of the Houfeng Bridge in Taichung County during Typhoon Sinlaku.
Especially worthy of attention is the fact that Freeway No. 6 has been built high above the ground in river valleys and in hilly areas, which leads one to wonder how activities such as gravel mining may have damaged the surrounding environment and whether this will compromise the safety of the freeway.
Third, we must ask how the freeway will affect the ecology of the environment by the side of the road. Even if all natural and human variables are taken into account when building such a road, no one can guarantee that the freeway will not damage the environment, a problem that is not wished away because the National Freeway Bureau built a number of “ecological zones.” Merely opening the freeway to traffic will bring noise and vibrations to a once-peaceful mountain area. Roads are not natural objects and their presence will have an impact on the local ecology, even when environmental impact assessments state that they will not.
Fourth, we must ask if the freeway will damage the wider environment. The road will bring larger numbers of tourists into the area. Recent media reports have said that more than double the normal amount of tourists have been visiting Puli, Sun Moon Lake (日月潭) and surrounding scenic areas.
Some reports said tourists have complained that they could not find food because of the sharp increase in visitors. It is difficult to guarantee that the environment will not suffer from large amounts of garbage, for example, or that animals and vegetation in surrounding forests will not suffer.
We cannot be concerned only with the potential economic benefits that a freeway can bring. The mountain areas of Nantou possess vast amounts of precious resources. Now that the freeway is open, forest-related development could accelerate, with greater incentives for illegal logging in the region.
Even more importantly, Nantou’s mountain regions have rare species of animals and vegetation that could be damaged by a dramatic increase in the number of tourists and a lack of attention to conservation.
Lastly, we must ask if the freeway will have an effect on the safety and health of local residents. The convenience brought by freeways can bring more crime — such as drug trafficking — into an area and affect local security because of higher mobility.
In addition, when an area is better serviced by transport, infectious diseases that are traditionally regarded as more urban in nature can enter a region at a faster pace. For example, a Japanese academic specializing in Southeast Asian ecology and the environment recently showed that HIV infection rates in areas near Thai borders had risen because of freeways.
Therefore, environmental impact assessments are not sufficient in these cases. An assessment of how a project will influence people should also be conducted.
There is no doubt that Freeway No. 6 will bring tourism and money to the remote scenic and mountainous areas of Nantou and make life and transport more convenient for local residents. However, positive features of remoteness will disappear with the opening of the freeway and increasing numbers of cars and tourists will head to the area. This will not only harm the environment, but also have a negative impact on local residents. We must be vigilant on these issues.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor in the department of political science at the Graduate Institute of Political Economy at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS