Over the past few days, China has continued an arbitrary crackdown on the signatories of Charter 08 — a move that flies in the face of its own laws.
Beijing has not recovered from the shock of the charter, a bold call for democratic reforms signed by hundreds of concerned citizens — including government officials — and it is not prepared to forgive.
Three weeks after the charter’s release, Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), former chairman of the non-governmental organization Independent Chinese PEN and a participant in the Tiananmen protests of 1989, spent his birthday in incommunicado detention.
Human Rights Watch said Liu’s arrest and detention violate “the minimum procedural guarantees specified under Chinese law.”
On Monday, Radio Free Asia reported on the situation unfolding in Sichuan, where signatories of Charter 08 have been subpoenaed and barred from communicating with the outside world. Those interrogated by police have said that questioning focused on how the Charter 08 movement was organized through the Internet.
Although it remains unclear what “crime” police are investigating, it is evident that they want to understand how dissidents scattered across the country managed to build a network.
China will have a hard time explaining in what way Liu and others, such as Zhang Zuhua (張祖樺), a legal expert who remains under police surveillance, violated the law or the principles enshrined in the Chinese Constitution, which protects freedom of speech. Beijing’s repression of Charter 08, which is now blocked on Google, Yahoo and Baidu in China, is itself a violation of that principle.
China tramples its own laws and inflicts arbitrary punishment on its perceived enemies in the name of “stability.” Yet, in the words of one of China’s best-known dissidents, human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng (高智晟), until China establishes rule of law, “the day when Chinese society is stable and harmonious will never come.”
Calls to end this latest crackdown have come from rights organizations such as the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and Amnesty International. Last week, a group of prominent figures — including academics and writers Salman Rushdie and Umberto Eco — sent an open letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) calling for Liu’s release.
Governments, including Taiwan’s, must back these calls.
The repression of Charter 08 should be of particular concern to the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Democratic reform and respect for human rights would not only benefit the 1.3 billion people of China, but also the 23 million Taiwanese living under the threat of missiles from across the Taiwan Strait.
Section 3, Article 18 of the charter, which addresses cross-strait relations, calls for negotiations between Taiwan and China “as equals” and urges Beijing to seek unification only through peaceful means and with full respect for democracy.
As ties with China grow stronger, the government must not shy away from criticizing Beijing and should strive to be a voice of freedom. In an interview soon after winning the presidential election, Ma said he believed Taiwan had a role to play in showing China the path to democracy. Yet it seems unlikely that Taiwan will play any such role unless it takes a firm stand against Beijing’s abuses of its own people.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS