The current attention is on how and whether emerging economies will avoid contagion from the present financial crisis. By the time of next year’s IMF meetings in Turkey, the focus is likely to be on preparing for recovery in 2010. But between now and then, the economic outlook for emerging economies is highly uncertain, with slowdown inevitable and recession possible in the most open economies. After the boom of recent years, the world economy will slow, dampening world trade and taking the heat out of commodity markets.
Whilst the immediate downside risks to emerging market growth need to be taken seriously, this should not be at the expense of taking a positive view of the longer-term outlook. All the positive factors that have led to strong growth across Asia and other regions in recent years remain in place to deliver stronger future growth.
One way to view the present situation is that emerging economies are not de-coupled from events in the West, but that they are better insulated than in the past. We have already seen contagion through exports slowing sharply, as equity markets have tumbled and, now, as investment plans and consumer confidence suffers. The deeper the US recession the greater the contagion, but the fall-out will not be as great as it would have been in the past.
Insulation is likely to be seen in many ways. The shortage of liquidity in the West is in sharp contrast to the ample liquidity seen across many emerging regions, particularly Asia and the Middle East, where savings are high. In fact, one legacy of previous financial crises, most notably in Asia in 1997 to 1998, is that around the world many countries have ensured they would be able to cope with a future crisis.
Currency reserves are high and there is much room for policy maneuver. Thus, it is important to put the present cyclical downturn in context. Yes, it may be a sharp downturn, as we have already seen with equities and exports slowing and with commodity prices easing. But it should not divert attention from the longer-term upward trend.
Three features need stressing. First, it is important to appreciate fully the scale and the pace of change on the ground in China. In the West, people understand China is growing strongly, but perhaps it is not fully appreciated just how dramatic this change is. It is evident in terms of China’s impact on commodity markets and on emerging market trade. Intra-Asian trade and trade between Asia and other regions such as Latin America, the Middle East and Africa has grown sharply, often with China at the center. Meanwhile within China, the private sector has been let loose, triggering pent-up spending, although this is still too heavily geared toward investment.
Second, and equally important, financial markets appear to still underestimate the catch-up potential of a wide array of emerging economies, such as India, Indonesia and Brazil, among others. Huge populations are just one part of the story; So too is the way these economies are leveraging off their domestic resources and at the same time trying to move up the value curve. The West may want to become knowledge-based economies, but so do many countries across the emerging world.
But third, one should not underestimate the potential volatility of many emerging markets. The trend may be up, but we should anticipate increased volatility along that upward trend. The business cycle has not been abandoned, despite the emergence of India and China. It is this third aspect that warrants particular attention at this time of economic and financial crisis in the West. Many emerging countries do not have the independent policy institutions, or indeed the policy tools that are taken for granted in the West. There has been, and continues to be, significant progress, but this does not lessen the challenges as we have seen increased volatility across financial markets and in capital flows.
All financial crises are different, but they often share common characteristics, where the outcome descends on the combination among fundamentals, the policy response, and confidence. China, in particular, has ample scope to use fiscal policy as its stock absorber, with the government preparing to spend its surplus if the economy’s investment-fueled growth stalls. India may not have the fiscal ammunition at China’s disposal but its corporate sector, for instance, has enjoyed healthy profit margins and has not placed itself at risk through excessive leverage. Indeed, most Asian economies have resilience from their lack of leverage, with low corporate debt, high household savings and generally low financial leverage. And with inflation worries being replaced by fears over growth, there is also the ability for monetary policy to be more stimulatory. Those defenses are likely to be tested now.
Gerard Lyons is chief economist and group head of global research at Standard Chartered Bank
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
There are no obvious connections between the 7-Eleven retail chain in Japan and the Philippines’ national security concerns in the South China Sea. Here is one, one that also takes in Canadian Broadcasting Corp (CBC), the government of Denmark and Taiwanese plastic surgeons on the way. Japan’s 7-Eleven on Friday last week posted on social media an image of uniforms worn by the chain store’s employees in various locations, including Taiwan, the US, Hawaii, Australia, Sweden, Denmark, Cambodia and the Philippines. If this was intended to promote a sense of camaraderie within the 7-Eleven family, it backfired. Taiwan was tagged with the