The past few months have been a major disappointment for the tourism industry, with a golden opportunity — the opening to China — failing to deliver. With many travel agencies complaining that they have yet to see any benefits from the increased quota for cross-strait tourism, it would seem that the impetus to bolster the tourism industry will have to come from elsewhere.
This week the Tourism Bureau made an overture to the Discovery Channel, inviting it to do another program on Taiwan — this time on next February’s lantern festival.
The bureau touted a one-hour program aired on the channel in the US this summer, a segment of which was devoted to Taiwan’s lantern festival celebrations. Officials are hoping to woo the producers back, promising that next year’s festivities — in particular the Taiwan Lantern Festival hosted by Ilan County — would be even more spectacular.
But the bureau’s praise, arguing that the short segment shown last year had given Taiwan “a spot on the world stage,” was, if anything, reflective of Taiwan’s all too unambitious efforts to advertise itself to potential travelers in other countries.
Watch CNN and you will see some very enticing commercials for South Korea, India, Malaysia, Singapore and China. Slogans like “Seoul: Soul of Asia” and “Malaysia, truly Asia” accompany images of the colorful traditions, culinary delicacies and beautiful scenery of these destinations. Rather than hoping the Discovery Channel would drop in to film the Pingsi Sky Lantern Festival again, why not be more ambitious in broadcasting images of this stunningly beautiful celebration to the world?
And by the world, we do not mean only China. Tourism officials would do well to focus more energy on other markets.
The government has hit a brick wall with China, where tight restrictions on which agencies can sell packages to Taiwan have made a mockery of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) prediction of Chinese hordes crowding the nation’s tourist spots on a daily basis.
The cross-strait weekend flights that began in July have proved more popular with commuting businesspeople than tourist groups — and then primarily with people wanting to fly in and out of Taipei.
But the Tourism Bureau has not given up, inviting representatives from dozens of Chinese travel agencies to tour the nation next month and organizing promotional events in several Chinese cities. At the heart of the disappointing numbers of Chinese visitors, however, are politics and Beijing’s lack of interest in reciprocation.
While Minister of Transportation and Communications Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國) said last month that adding cross-strait flights would bring more Chinese, the fact is that some of the existing weekend routes have already been suspended because of a lack of passengers. No one in China, it seems, is interested in Kaohsiung.
In that context, doting on the Chinese market may not pay off for some time to come. An equally good place to seek new visitors would therefore be other Asian countries, where the government could promote Taiwan more vigorously.
A single appearance on the Discovery Channel does not constitute a “spot on the world stage” any more than the Lantern Festival represents all that Taiwan has to offer.
Ambitious results only come from ambitious efforts. After years of observing lazy bureaucrats doing the work of professional marketers and being oblivious to their failings, the depressing question that follows is if this situation can ever change.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
RSS