The past few months have been a major disappointment for the tourism industry, with a golden opportunity — the opening to China — failing to deliver. With many travel agencies complaining that they have yet to see any benefits from the increased quota for cross-strait tourism, it would seem that the impetus to bolster the tourism industry will have to come from elsewhere.
This week the Tourism Bureau made an overture to the Discovery Channel, inviting it to do another program on Taiwan — this time on next February’s lantern festival.
The bureau touted a one-hour program aired on the channel in the US this summer, a segment of which was devoted to Taiwan’s lantern festival celebrations. Officials are hoping to woo the producers back, promising that next year’s festivities — in particular the Taiwan Lantern Festival hosted by Ilan County — would be even more spectacular.
But the bureau’s praise, arguing that the short segment shown last year had given Taiwan “a spot on the world stage,” was, if anything, reflective of Taiwan’s all too unambitious efforts to advertise itself to potential travelers in other countries.
Watch CNN and you will see some very enticing commercials for South Korea, India, Malaysia, Singapore and China. Slogans like “Seoul: Soul of Asia” and “Malaysia, truly Asia” accompany images of the colorful traditions, culinary delicacies and beautiful scenery of these destinations. Rather than hoping the Discovery Channel would drop in to film the Pingsi Sky Lantern Festival again, why not be more ambitious in broadcasting images of this stunningly beautiful celebration to the world?
And by the world, we do not mean only China. Tourism officials would do well to focus more energy on other markets.
The government has hit a brick wall with China, where tight restrictions on which agencies can sell packages to Taiwan have made a mockery of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) prediction of Chinese hordes crowding the nation’s tourist spots on a daily basis.
The cross-strait weekend flights that began in July have proved more popular with commuting businesspeople than tourist groups — and then primarily with people wanting to fly in and out of Taipei.
But the Tourism Bureau has not given up, inviting representatives from dozens of Chinese travel agencies to tour the nation next month and organizing promotional events in several Chinese cities. At the heart of the disappointing numbers of Chinese visitors, however, are politics and Beijing’s lack of interest in reciprocation.
While Minister of Transportation and Communications Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國) said last month that adding cross-strait flights would bring more Chinese, the fact is that some of the existing weekend routes have already been suspended because of a lack of passengers. No one in China, it seems, is interested in Kaohsiung.
In that context, doting on the Chinese market may not pay off for some time to come. An equally good place to seek new visitors would therefore be other Asian countries, where the government could promote Taiwan more vigorously.
A single appearance on the Discovery Channel does not constitute a “spot on the world stage” any more than the Lantern Festival represents all that Taiwan has to offer.
Ambitious results only come from ambitious efforts. After years of observing lazy bureaucrats doing the work of professional marketers and being oblivious to their failings, the depressing question that follows is if this situation can ever change.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS