It was with a sense of comeuppance that the Integrity Committee of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) suspended Taitung County Commissioner Kuang Li-chen (鄺麗貞) from the party last week for spending millions of taxpayer dollars on overseas inspection trips.
Kuang’s probable downfall is long overdo and highlights some of the problems still plaguing Taiwan’s nascent democracy — problems like unqualified officials being elected in the first place.
When the former KMT Taitung County commissioner Wu Chun-li (吳俊立) was convicted of corruption and vote buying back in 2005, he did something far-fetched even by Taiwanese political standards.
In a move that would be laughable if it weren’t so outrageous, Wu “divorced” Kuang, his then-wife, so he could sidestep the legal restrictions on appointing a spouse or relative as his deputy, and in effect retain the commissioner seat.
More astonishing still was the fact that not only did many members of the pan-blue camp come to Wu’s defense and support Kuang in the subsequent by-election — including President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — but the electorate in Taitung gave her an overwhelming victory at the polls.
The current Kuang kafuffle first broke a week ago when she and 10 Taitung County township heads returned from an overseas “investigation tour” where they spent 13 days jet-setting around Europe while her constituents suffered in the aftermath of Typhoon Fung-wong.
She has since been justifiably criticized by the media for leaving the country before the typhoon, spending public funds for trips of questionable value, possibly in the hope of securing support from the Taitung heads with whom she traveled.
Kuang has claimed that the trip and seven others like it were legal. This may be true, but there is still something wrong with an official flying off to Europe on the taxpayer’s dime while her constituents are left to clean up a natural disaster.
The case, more than anything else, serves as a symbol of some of the systemic problems still afflicting Taiwan’s democracy and the elected officials who feel they can flout the law because of a lack of tough legal mechanisms to keep them in check.
Although the KMT suspended her from the party, top leaders have been mute on how long Kuang’s membership would be suspended. This is somewhat problematic because the party seems to be biding its time to see the results of the prosecutor’s investigation before making a final decision.
The silver lining in this morass is perhaps that finally the government will begin to fill in the gray areas that exist for bureaucratic excess and make these politicians more accountable to the electorate.
But only time will tell. Kuang’s suspension is just that and she hasn’t yet been kicked out of the party. With county commissioner elections scheduled for December of next year, it will be interesting to see whether or not Kuang will be on the ballot — or her “ex-husband” if he manages to beat the legal system on appeal.
But ultimately it was the electorate in Taitung who gave Kuang her mandate in the first place, knowing perfectly well what kind of populist politician she was. It is they — and by extension the electorate in Taiwan — who will have to decide whether or not they want Kuang and her ilk to serve as elected representatives. Judging from past experience, however, we don’t have much to hope for.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Workers’ rights groups on July 17 called on the Ministry of Labor to protect migrant fishers, days after CNN reported what it described as a “pattern of abuse” in Taiwan’s distant-water fishing industry. The report detailed the harrowing account of Indonesian migrant fisher Silwanus Tangkotta, who crushed his fingers in a metal door last year while aboard a Taiwanese fishing vessel. The captain reportedly refused to return to port for medical treatment, as they “hadn’t caught enough fish to justify the trip.” Tangkotta lost two fingers, and was fired and denied compensation upon returning to land. Another former migrant fisher, Adrian Dogdodo