In the face of Taiwan’s ailing economy, complaints can be heard everywhere. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who says he is “taking a back seat” and calls himself a zhainan (home boy), finally made some confidence building remarks when receiving Chinese National Federation of Industries chairman Preston Chen (陳武雄) and the federation’s board of directors on Wednesday.
Ma said the government should take responsibility for the public discontent triggered by rising prices and falling incomes, but that despite this situation, the government should stay calm and not intervene excessively.
He also said that as long as Taiwan’s economic fundamentals are sound, there was still a chance that the nation’s economy would return to prosperity.
He also said that Taiwan had experienced several big challenges in recent decades, including the global oil crisis, and the Asian financial crisis, but that it had managed to overcome all these obstacles.
“We have our own advantages, so we must have confidence in ourselves,” Ma said.
Since the transfer of power on May 20, the international prices of oil, raw materials and agricultural products have surged, planting the seeds of imported inflation.
As the government insists on oil and electricity hikes and respects the market mechanism, it is gradually losing its ability to control and stabilize consumer prices.
The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics said the consumer price index rose 4.97 percent year-on-year last month, the second highest increase since September 1996.
The core price index rose 3.7 percent, the biggest jump in 12 years, and the wholesale price index for imported commodities valued in US dollars soared by 25.89 percent last month, its highest increase since June 1980.
Meanwhile, the public’s nominal wealth has fallen sharply.
This double pressure is causing public suffering and dissatisfaction, which in its turn is causing Ma’s approval ratings to drop, which is what forced him to make his confidence-building remarks.
Will Ma’s pep talk be effective? Frankly speaking, there is not too much cause for optimism. The reason for this is public doubt about the negative economic consequences of his China policy, rather than lack of confidence in Taiwan.
China-leaning measures like raising the maximum level for China-bound investments, the crowding-out effect resulting from the opening up of Taiwan to Chinese tourism and the domestic consumption outflow due to the opening of direct links will only further damage Taiwan’s faltering economy.
Most people believe in Taiwan’s excellent democratic system and economic fundamentals. But even those who voted for Ma no longer dare put any hope in the government after examining its performance over the past two months.
In other words, Taiwan’s economic fundamentals are on a sound enough footing to overcome many challenges. But people are disappointed with the government’s uncertain, desperate, contradictory moves and helplessness.
The public has seen through the government and is fed up. Confidence is crumbling. This situation can hardly be reversed by empty confidence building pep talks.
The desperate behavior of the Ma administration has caused several policy failures and drawn much criticism.
The performance of so-called financial and economic experts and experienced officials is mediocre and this incompetence cannot be swept under the carpet by attempts at flirting with a personality cult by playing up these experts.
The government’s biggest embarrassment is its handling of the falling stock market. Before coming to power, Ma bragged about how the stock market would boom, followed up by various other irresponsible statements.
For instance, Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) said the TAIEX would at least exceed 10,000 points while Ma took aim at 20,000 points, as did Minister of Economic Affairs Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘).
High-ranking officials behaved as if they were trying to outbid each other at an auction and were very pleased with themselves.
Now that the index has dropped more than 2,000 points, officials are either ignoring the situation or shirking responsibility by saying that there is “no remedy” to the situation and that 20,000 points was a joke.
Ma has even come out to call on the public to “work together to overcome the hard times,” but even if investors who believe in the government are willing to do so, they will not see any improvements but will instead lose their hard earned capital.
The plunging stock market is not the only mess Ma’s government has created.
First, implementing oil and electricity hikes without appropriate complementary measures only pushed up consumer prices.
Second, to spend the budget and attract voters, the government has launched a domestic demand expansion plan to the tune of NT$110 billion (US$3.6 billion), all but disregarding worsening inflation.
Third, in terms of domestic politics, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) may enjoy a legislative majority of almost three-quarters, but the legislature still rejected Ma’s nominee for Control Yuan vice president, thus putting his leadership in doubt.
This is why Ma stopped avoiding the sensitive stock market issue and called for public confidence in person.
He did not do so in order to save the stock market; he did so to save his and his administration’s approval ratings.
However, trying to solve the political and economic difficulties through a call for confidence without any substantive measures is destined to be ineffectual.
To overcome the difficulties, the Ma administration must “pull back the horse from the cliff’s edge,” as the Chinese saying goes, and stop leaning toward China.
Ma should strengthen communication and coordination, as well as government efficiency and he should come up with concrete plans to stimulate the nation’s economy. This is the only way to inspire public confidence and ride out the crisis.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Sitting in their homes typing on their keyboards and posting on Facebook things like, “Taiwan has already lost its democracy,” “The Democratic Progressive Party is a party of green communists,” or “President William Lai [賴清德] is a dictator,” then turning around and heading to the convenience store to buy a tea egg and an iced Americano, casually chatting in a Line group about which news broadcast was more biased this morning — are such people truly clear about the kind of society in which they are living? This is not meant to be sarcasm or criticism, but an exhausted honesty.
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
RSS