BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATIC Progressive Party (DPP) won less than one-fourth of the legislative seats in the Jan. 12 elections, it would be difficult for the party to get any of the 16 legislative committee chairmanships if the posts were filled by voting. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has offered to let the DPP have four of these seats, and DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) has said the party should accept it or it might not be able to propose laws in future.
It would of course be a problem if the DPP were unable to file important law proposals independently. Nonetheless, I propose that the offer be declined. Even with four committee chairpersons, the laws the DPP can propose would be limited. Furthermore, even with a DPP member at the helm, the party's committee members will still be a minority, making it virtually impossible for any bill to be passed in accord with DPP wishes.
Instead, the DPP should use this opportunity to demand legislative reform. Each legislative committee used to have three chairpersons. Although this number has been reduced to two, it is still high compared with other democracies. This strange structure is a remnant of the authoritarian period.
Intent on dominating and reducing the legislature's power, dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) adopted many unusual measures, including appointing three chairpersons for each legislative committee. Most countries have only one chairperson, normally a senior lawmaker, to strengthen the legislature and create an effective counterweight to the executive.
Chiang chose three chairpersons per committee to divide the spoils of power in line with his "divide and conquer" policy. He also instituted a rule requiring members to move to a different committee every legislative session, which ensured that everyone could sit on the more popular committees and that members never became specialists.
This spirit of sharing the spoils of power can also be seen in the interpellation system. The interpellation is meant to be a political discussion between the opposition and the Cabinet. But in Taiwan, both opposition and ruling party legislators take turns asking questions mostly intended to impress their constituents. This system made things easy for the Cabinet and legislators, but it weakened the legislature's status and effectiveness.
With democratization, it should be possible to cast off this old system. New legislators should make it clear that they are not just a new set of squabbling legislative "monsters" and should use this opportunity for reform. Ma is using the old spoils-sharing system to co-opt smaller parties by creating an image of generosity and the small parties, unfortunately, are happily biting.
To change this system, Taiwan should adopt the standard system with one chairperson and one vice chairperson instead of two or three chairpersons per committee. Having a single committee head is necessary to establish legislative accountability and effectively counterbalance the government's power. The system of rotating legislators between committees should also be changed. Instead of sitting on a different committee every year, legislators should stay in one committee for an entire legislative term.
The interpellation should be reinstated as a political discussion between the opposition and the government. I hope the new legislature will make this effort to address public doubts about the new legislature. Having suffered a serious blow to its prestige, the DPP should take up this appeal and stop perpetuating the old spoils-sharing system.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.