RECENT TV COMMERCIALS by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) make me worry about Taiwan's future. How can it be OK for the KMT to use its party assets to distort facts? It professes to love Taiwan while making it look bad. Its ideology is pro-China and anti-Taiwan.
Look at their claim that the economy is so bad people can't make ends meet. China sees tens of thousands of mass uprisings a year; Taiwan does not. Using a scorched earth tactic, the pan-blue legislative majority blocks the budgets that would develop Taiwan's economy and national security, and then blames the government for being ineffective.
Then they say that Taiwan must therefore unify with China.
Should Taiwan really become a part of China, an empire of lies?
Unfair aspects of the election system were abolished after the authoritarian era ended, such as electoral district divisions and the KMT using its party assets to secure votes. The strong influence the party still has over the judiciary makes the elections extremely difficult for the pro-localization democratic pan-green camp. No matter how hard it tries, it cannot win a legislative majority. It would be a catastrophe for Taiwan if the KMT, which works closely with Beijing, won a two-thirds legislative majority.
The cooperation between the pro-China New Party and the forces in the KMT supporting former chairman Lien Chan's (
Taiwan is the only democratic country in the world that has a presidential candidate like the KMT's Ma Ying-jeou (
Is he a fit candidate for a democratic country?
Facing such a grim outlook, the pan-green politicians must consider their options.
To win votes, candidates need to mobilize the public and appeal to moderate voters. But pan-green voters also face the problem of whom to vote for, as pan-green politicians are competing against each other. It's not easy to accumulate enough votes to win a legislative seat, but with candidates attacking each other, tens of thousands of votes are lost to the green camp if one of them loses, and then the legislative seat is lost.
Two years ago, the Democratic Progressive Party won the Kaohsiung mayoral elections by a razor-thin margin, resulting in a year of lawsuits. What if the party had lost those few thousands ballots?
Pan-green politicians competing against each other -- regardless of what party they represent or how well they are doing in polls -- must take the initiative to step back and give their votes and their support to the opposing pan-green candidate. At first this might seem to mean throwing away one's political future, but it will benefit the pan-green camp and all of Taiwan. In any case, it is far more preferable to letting a pro-Chinese party win these seats.
Doing so would create more room for Taiwan and take a candidate out of a difficult situation while showing him or her as open-minded, sensible and democratic, thus creating new possibilities for future elections.
Politicians need to move the public. Whoever steps back to make way for another pan-green candidate will move both his or her own voters and those in other districts, showing them that pan-green politicians truly fight for Taiwan's future and not for themselves or for partisan benefits. Taiwanese will remember a candidate stepping back for the greater good.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS