National Taiwan University (NTU) has received a massive amount in donations this year. After Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (
The Ministry of Education (MOE) has encouraged colleges and universities to raise funds themselves since the education budget was frozen in 1997. Of all the schools, NTU has the best fund-raising ability, and it is the envy of other schools that receive little attention.
Indeed, donations to schools for research purposes allow them to carry out large projects. However, when enterprises make large donations, the problem of resource distribution is highlighted, as humanities and social science colleges seldom receive large donations.
Humanities and social science colleges are praised as being in the "industry of creativity." But industry support for them is insignificant when compared to the information or optoelectronics industry. For example, when the NTU's Department of Electrical Engineering building was nearly completed, the construction of the College of Social Science had just begun, and the College of Liberal Arts was still in the planning stage.
The spectacular new building for the College of Public Health was completed, while the College of Social Science was still struggling with its dream of promoting an East Asian renaissance. Just walking past these buildings, the contrast between them is striking.
As for scholarships, there is also a huge gap between the colleges. As I reviewed NTU's list of scholarships for different colleges, the number and dollar amount of scholarships for the College of Social Science is far below what is offered in the Colleges of Science and Engineering, again reflecting uneven resource distribution.
The unfavorable position of the College of Social Science and other liberal arts institutions is mostly a result of social prejudice. The keen support of government and industry only make the situation more obvious.
After all, the College of Social Science can hardly produce technical personnel who can make money for enterprises and conglomerates right after graduation.
Naturally, the industry is not interested in graduates from such colleges. However, unlike the Colleges of Science and Engineering, it does not take much for the College of Social Science and other humanities departments to promote their overall research standards and quality.
It is possible to narrow the enterprise donation gap between different colleges. Besides setting up special accounts to appropriate such funds, schools can try to convince donors to donate part of the donation for other school affairs. Also, the government can lift the tax-deduction quota for donations to social science or humanities colleges, so as to encourage enterprises to make donations to them.
In the NTU's case, apart from its strong fund-raising ability, an appropriate resource distribution method is necessary. It is hoped that sponsors can show direct support to the NTU's College of Social Science, and it should think over the distribution and use of its resources, rather than turning these colleges into a "third world" of resource distribution.
Yeh Hong-ling is a student at the Graduate Institute of Political Science at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
RSS