National Taiwan University (NTU) has received a massive amount in donations this year. After Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (
The Ministry of Education (MOE) has encouraged colleges and universities to raise funds themselves since the education budget was frozen in 1997. Of all the schools, NTU has the best fund-raising ability, and it is the envy of other schools that receive little attention.
Indeed, donations to schools for research purposes allow them to carry out large projects. However, when enterprises make large donations, the problem of resource distribution is highlighted, as humanities and social science colleges seldom receive large donations.
Humanities and social science colleges are praised as being in the "industry of creativity." But industry support for them is insignificant when compared to the information or optoelectronics industry. For example, when the NTU's Department of Electrical Engineering building was nearly completed, the construction of the College of Social Science had just begun, and the College of Liberal Arts was still in the planning stage.
The spectacular new building for the College of Public Health was completed, while the College of Social Science was still struggling with its dream of promoting an East Asian renaissance. Just walking past these buildings, the contrast between them is striking.
As for scholarships, there is also a huge gap between the colleges. As I reviewed NTU's list of scholarships for different colleges, the number and dollar amount of scholarships for the College of Social Science is far below what is offered in the Colleges of Science and Engineering, again reflecting uneven resource distribution.
The unfavorable position of the College of Social Science and other liberal arts institutions is mostly a result of social prejudice. The keen support of government and industry only make the situation more obvious.
After all, the College of Social Science can hardly produce technical personnel who can make money for enterprises and conglomerates right after graduation.
Naturally, the industry is not interested in graduates from such colleges. However, unlike the Colleges of Science and Engineering, it does not take much for the College of Social Science and other humanities departments to promote their overall research standards and quality.
It is possible to narrow the enterprise donation gap between different colleges. Besides setting up special accounts to appropriate such funds, schools can try to convince donors to donate part of the donation for other school affairs. Also, the government can lift the tax-deduction quota for donations to social science or humanities colleges, so as to encourage enterprises to make donations to them.
In the NTU's case, apart from its strong fund-raising ability, an appropriate resource distribution method is necessary. It is hoped that sponsors can show direct support to the NTU's College of Social Science, and it should think over the distribution and use of its resources, rather than turning these colleges into a "third world" of resource distribution.
Yeh Hong-ling is a student at the Graduate Institute of Political Science at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS