In the television business the grim reality of the writers' strike has set in, with the prospect of a long shutdown of scripted shows growing stronger by the day.
But in what seems to be growing consensus among executives at the TV networks, the strike could contain a faint glimmer of good news for one group of shows: struggling, barely surviving prime-time series.
"The strike definitely could be a good thing for some marginal shows," said Preston Beckman, the executive in charge of scheduling for the Fox network.
That theory was seconded by executives at the other networks and at several studios, most of whom asked for and were granted anonymity because of a code of silence about strike issues that is in place at the big production companies.
Very soon the networks will begin running low on original scripted episodes of shows; any new episode will become an increasingly valuable commodity. No network is going to waste bought-and-paid-for episodes. So the marginal shows will stay on until their episodes run out, which, in most cases, will mean sometime between now and the end of January.
The executives pointed to specific shows that might have been facing cancellation or at least trips to the hiatus shelf in previous television seasons. Now, thanks to the strike, these shows will surely get to run their full complement of episodes -- and perhaps win a shot at coming back next year.
In this group are first-season series like Journeyman and Life on NBC, K-ville and Back to You on Fox, Big Shots and Carpoolers on ABC and Cane on CBS.
Some holdover shows may also be affected for the better. Those possibilities include Friday Night Lights on NBC, Men in Trees on ABC, 'Til Death on Fox and Shark on CBS.
PLAYING OUT
In other seasons, some shows like these, which have teetered on the ratings fence, might have been temporarily shelved or yanked off the air.
Now, as Beckman noted, "they're just going to be allowed to play out."
And as another senior network program executive put it, "We're going to get a little extra look at some of these shows, and maybe they'll help themselves."
A show like Friday Night Lights, for instance, with its high critical praise and low ratings, could get a chance to break through in January, when it is likely to be among the few fall series with some new episodes left. The show started production early and managed to complete 15 episodes before the strike.
In general, shows with self-contained stories may be deemed more viable, because they have a better chance to do well in repeats. CBS's schedule has so many crime dramas that repeat well, like CSI and NCIS, that it may be better off during the strike than its competitors.
ABC's regular lineup is dominated by serialized shows like Desperate Housewives that do not repeat well.
But that could benefit the one new crime drama ABC owns, Women's Murder Club. ABC could move that show off Friday, where its ratings have been marginal (it has a tryout Thursday night at 10), and see different results because most viewers haven't seen the episodes in first run.
In January the series that had been held in reserve will get their shots on the air, usually in limited runs. These include shows like Lost and Cashmere Mafia on ABC, The Sarah Connor Chronicles on Fox and Jericho on CBS. And some of these shows could do better than they would have otherwise, because by the time they get on, they would not have to face original episodes of shows like Grey's Anatomy and House. They would instead be facing either repeats or substitute programming like newsmagazines or reality shows.
They could benefit from the weakened competition, or from being placed adjacent to hit reality shows like American Idol on Fox and Dancing With the Stars on ABC, leading them to stand out even more. For just this reason Fox is planning to insert episodes of Back to You after Idol in March.
"Some of these shows might do much better than they would have without the strike," one senior network executive said.
Several network executives pointed out that the downside of the strike is still far greater than any tiny upside. As some marginal shows find a hope for new life, some incipient hit shows could see their early hopes squashed. New shows that have been building momentum, like Samantha Who? on ABC, The Big Bang Theory on CBS and Chuck on NBC, could get forgotten over months off the air while the audience moves on to other entertainment choices.
The biggest challenge for programmers may come if the strike continues long into the new year. Then development for next year's shows will be severely affected, because pilots for a new fall season may never get made.
Many drama scripts have already been turned in, but those almost always get worked on many more times before a pilot is commissioned. Comedies, few of which are ordered this early, are even more works in constant progress, so the strike could mean few or no new comedy pilots will get into finished shape.
That would leave networks in the position of having to put together a future lineup based on whatever spare parts seem to work this winter and a lot of shows that have not produced new episodes in a long time. Again, the result could be consideration for shows that otherwise might have looked replaceable.
"We may renew some series just because we know what we have with them, and we have no idea what else we'll have," one network executive said. "If we thought the show was being well produced and showed at least some promise, my guess is we would bring it back."
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS