During the Martial Law era, the Legislative Yuan was an "abnormal" body which, until 1992, was filled with representatives elected to represent all provinces in China -- a situation that exposed it to international ridicule. It resembled more a branch of the Cabinet, rather than an independent institution. It was unable to truly exercise its function of maintaining checks and balances in the government.
However, waves of reforms have gradually transformed the legislature until it became a body worthy of a democracy.
But politics in Taiwan can change direction very fast. In 2000, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took over the government from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After this, the legislature became an even fiercer battleground between the ruling and the opposition parties.
The result is gridlock, with more sensitive proposals, like the draft defense budget and a draft law on retrieving the KMT's ill-gotten wealth, being blocked by the opposition-dominated Procedure Committee.
Even this year's government budget was blocked for half a year before it finally passed.
The appointment of new grand justices also suffered, with the opposition parties adopting a partial boycott by sending only their caucus leaders to vote. The result was that none of the nominations for candidates labeled "deep green" passed.
This was yet another sacrifice made in the continuing battle between the ruling and the opposition parties.
While this model of resistance no doubt satisfies an opposition bent on showing its political power, to the public, it is nothing but a manifestation of the legislature's inability to rationally discuss public issues. Seeing legislators act like a bunch of children, the public has lost its confidence in the legislature.
Media reports say that even after the number of seats in the legislature is halved, the legislative budget will stay the same. This has given rise to public misgivings that when a new legislature takes office, legislators will enjoy even more benefits and twice the power.
One reason why 70 percent of the public supported halving the number of legislative seats when it was first proposed was frustration with the power and prestige of the legislative departments. The public thought that reducing the number of legislators could force the legislative body to listen to public opinion. They never thought that the result of this measure would be the exact opposite.
Hopes that the legislature could turn into a normal, democratically functioning body appear to be dim. Nongovernmental organizations supervising the legislature are hoping that the new legislature will push for more sunshine laws, observe civilized behavior, promote transparency, care for the public and upgrade efficiency. Instead, they are more likely to see legislators continuing to misbehave and ignoring self-discipline in favor of self-enrichment.
Nevertheless, I hope that in the last session of the current legislature, all caucuses and legislators could still learn from the support or opposition they get from the public.
Legislators should establish rules of behavior and learn how to exercise power in a civilized manner. More importantly, they should keep a tight check on the budget. They cannot afford to be lax in controlling the legislature but strict in governing the people.
The long-term effects of holding a double standard will be that the image of the legislature will never improve -- and it will become the greatest mockery of democratic politics.
Ku Chung-hwa is chairman of the Citizen Congress Watch.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Workers’ rights groups on July 17 called on the Ministry of Labor to protect migrant fishers, days after CNN reported what it described as a “pattern of abuse” in Taiwan’s distant-water fishing industry. The report detailed the harrowing account of Indonesian migrant fisher Silwanus Tangkotta, who crushed his fingers in a metal door last year while aboard a Taiwanese fishing vessel. The captain reportedly refused to return to port for medical treatment, as they “hadn’t caught enough fish to justify the trip.” Tangkotta lost two fingers, and was fired and denied compensation upon returning to land. Another former migrant fisher, Adrian Dogdodo
RSS