Big shot captains of industry in South Korea who break the law have an ace in the hole: the leniency of their country's appeals court judges.
Two such tycoons -- Chung Mong-koo of Hyundai Motor Co and Kim Seung-youn of Hanwha Group -- within the past week stood before magistrates who suspended their prison terms for, respectively, embezzlement and assault.
In the most recent case on Tuesday, Hanwha's Kim, who runs a chemicals and finance conglomerate, had his 18-month jail term for organizing and taking part in a spectacular revenge beating earlier this year shelved largely as a result of a deterioration in his health.
And last week, Chung, who leads the world's sixth-largest automaker, listened in a packed Seoul courtroom to a judge suspend his three-year sentence, saying the 69-year-old is too vital to the country's economy to spend time in a prison cell.
Experts cited various reasons for the leniency, including the idea among South Korea's judiciary that the chance of a criminal recurrence by the offending executives is slim.
"Absolutely the judge will think there is no possibility they will commit the same crime again," said Hwang Ju-myung, co-founder of Seoul law firm Hwang Mok Park PC and a former judge himself.
In the case of Hyundai's Chung, South Korea's national interest trumped legal reasoning.
"I am also a citizen of the Republic of Korea," Presiding Judge Lee Jae-hong said in court. "I was unwilling to engage in a gamble that would put the nation's economy at risk."
Michael Breen, a longtime resident of South Korea and author of the book The Koreans, said it is hard for the chiefs of the country's economically dominant family run business empires, known as chaebol, to avoid illegal activity in a big business culture characterized by corruption.
"This is in a context where breaking the law is the norm," he said of wrongdoing by the business titans.
Kim's case drew wide attention as, rather than the usual corporate malfeasance, it was centered on headline-grabbing violence.
He was convicted in July of abducting and assaulting off-duty bar workers allegedly involved in an altercation with his son, threatening the victims with an electronic shock device and hitting one with a steel pipe.
Kim Deuk-hwan, the judge who handed down Tuesday's decision, condemned the crime, but cited Kim's health -- Hanwha officials say he has suffered from maladies including depression and insomnia since being jailed -- and the fact that he showed remorse.
But the judge also appeared to show some sympathy, telling the court that the executive "lost his sense of reason because of fatherly love after seeing his son's injuries."
Sparing chaebol chiefs from jail has a precedent.
In 2005, a court suspended a three-year prison term for accounting irregularities handed to Chey Tae-won, CEO and chairman of South Korea's leading oil refiner, SK Corp, now SK Energy.
Breen said the willingness of judges to show leniency can also be found in the idea that going through the humiliation of a trial and prison sentencing is probably punishment enough.
"The spirit of the law has been applied and the letter of the law doesn't need to be applied any further," he said.
Still, they have paid a price.
Both Chung and Kim, 55, were ordered to do community service and even though they escaped lengthy prison sentences, their convictions stand.
And Chung, convicted of embezzling the equivalent of more than US$100 million in company money to set up a slush fund, was told to follow through on a costly promise.
Last year he publicly vowed to donate 1 trillion won (US$1.1 billion) of his personal assets to society as the scandal over which he was eventually convicted was heating up.
Though Hyundai and Hanwha both welcomed the decisions, some in South Korea had bitter words for the country's judges.
"Instead of undoing injustice for the people, the judiciary simply patronizes the public," Hwang Sun, deputy spokesman of South Korea's Democratic Labor Party, said in a statement on his party's Web site.
"We knew that the judiciary was not fair to all, but these verdicts ... have surpassed the unimaginable," he wrote.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS