President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) recent trip to Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Central America has prompted fierce domestic criticism of the nation's foreign aid policies. With China using its growing power to restrict Taiwan's ability to freely participate on the international stage, I would like to point out the differences between China and Taiwan's foreign aid efforts.
China's aid has reached US$10 billion (NT$331 billion) in recent years, and is particularly focused on building infrastructure in Africa. In Sudan, for example, China has built large reservoirs and highways.
But a few months ago, I led a team to the Caribbean island of St. Lucia to do some appraisal work. At the time, I learned that China was helping construct a psychiatric center capable of accommodating 200 patients. Saint Lucia has a population of just 166,000. Does it really have a need for such a large facility?
Moreover, China has grown accustomed to helping African countries build sports stadiums capable of holding 50,000-60,000 people. With widespread poverty in Africa, I wonder who will pay the large bills for those facilities?
The agricultural technical advisors that China dispatches are accustomed to fencing themselves off and ignoring the local government and population. China's foreign aid model is discriminatory and encourages unreasonable practices.
In recent years, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has strongly emphasized aid efficiency. Infrastructure projects tend to involve lots of money and are more susceptible to corruption, so the organization reminds donor countries to act prudently.
In contrast, through the International Cooperation and Development Fund, Taiwan's foreign aid is transparent, more systematized and professional. The fund assists Taiwan's allies to develop economically by engaging in technological cooperation, establishing the host country's own capabilities and providing loans to governments and micro loans to local people. Anyone can go online to see the full content of the fund's projects. Its teams of technical advisors cooperate closely with locals.
For example, although Costa Rica broke off diplomatic ties with Taiwan in June, one of the recipients of Taiwan's technical aid to the orchid industry has become head of the Orchid Association of Costa Rica. Watermelons planted in Africa were species brought from Taiwan, whose technical teams helped to teach locals how to cultivate the crops they need.
In another example, the Solomon Islands used to import rice. With technological assistance from Taiwan, the country is now self-sufficient in rice. Recipients of the fund's scholarships for foreign students use their two or three years studying in Taiwan to research and discuss with professors the problems facing their country.
These are things that the Taiwanese public don't see. For years, "foreign aid" has often been seen as "financial aid." But the definition of foreign aid is not so narrow. It is a multi-functional tool used to reduce the poverty that blocks progress in developing nations, which comprise the majority of Taiwan's allies.
While everyone debates the imbalance in Taiwan's foreign aid, there is still a group of people quietly going about their work, because for them, this is both a mission and source of pride. For years, the Democratic and Republican parties in the US have had a tacit agreement that on foreign relations matters, they put aside partisan differences and work together. I hope that Taiwan's ruling and opposition parties can do the same to support its foreign aid.
Lee Pai-po is assistant secretary-general of the International Cooperation and Development Fund.
Translated by Marc Langer
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had