China faced a barrage of international condemnation from London to Canberra on Friday after it was revealed that it had launched a missile attack on an aging weather satellite, a test that threatened to open a "Star Wars" space race.
Formal protests were lodged with the Beijing government, accompanied by expressions of concern from world leaders, including British Prime Minister Tony Blair. US President George W. Bush's administration is privately seething over the event and is believed to be preparing to turn the incident into a major diplomatic spat.
The concern in the US is that the satellite-killing missile test -- said by the US national security council to have been carried out on Jan. 11 -- demonstrated China has the capability to knock out its military satellite system, which the Pentagon depends on for navigation and surveillance.
US military and diplomatic analysts said a Chinese attack on about 40 to 50 satellites in low orbit round the world would leave the country's military blinded within a matter of hours.
But others, more sceptical about US policy, insist China had a right to challenge the US's effective monopoly of space. They noted that Beijing has repeatedly pressed for the US to sign agreements outlawing arms in space, overtures Washington has repeatedly rejected.
A Chinese government spokesman, Liu Jianchao (
The Russian government, which claims to favor demilitarization of space, expressed doubts about the nature of the test, claiming it was only a rumor that it was a demonstration of an anti-satellite capability. Its defense minister, Sergei Ivanov, said: "I'm afraid that it didn't have an anti-satellite basis. And, maybe, it's good that it didn't."
But the US, Britain, Japan, Australia and other countries had no doubts. London, while acknowledging China had broken no treaties, expressed dismay that it gave no advance warning of its action.
A spokesman at the prime minister's office at No. 10 Downing Street revealed that London had protested on Wednesday, arguing that the test is "inconsistent" with Beijing's earlier assurances to the UN on the military use of space, and will add to the space debris problem.
Downing Street said: "We don't believe that this does contravene international law. What we are concerned about, however, is lack of consultation and we believe that this development of this technology and the manner in which this test was conducted is inconsistent with the spirit of China's statements to the UN and other bodies on the military use of space."
The destruction of the Chinese satellite was the first such attack in space since the US carried out a similar test in 1985, when Ronald Reagan was pursuing the "Star Wars" anti-missile defense program.
The US, which has been trying to establish a closer relationship with China, has been reluctant recently to criticize Beijing but on Thursday lodged a formal protest.
Relations between the US and China have been improving since a stand-off in 2001 when a US surveillance aircraft was forced to land on Hainan island.
Dana Perino, the deputy White House press secretary, said Saturday that Chinese officials had not yet responded to concerns expressed by the US. "We do want cooperation on a civil space strategy, so until we hear back from them or have more information, I don't have any more to add," she said.
Although China offers no threat at present, the fear is that if there were a stand-off over Taiwan, the Chinese might be tempted by the option of destroying US satellites.
Worry was also expressed by China's near neighbors, Japan and South Korea. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said: "We must use space for peace. We are asking the Chinese government about the test."
Alexander Downer, the Australian foreign minister, who was on a visit to New York, said Beijing's ambassador to Australia, Fu Ying (
"Our concern about this is that to have a capacity to shoot down satellites in outer space is not consistent with ... the traditional Chinese position of opposition to the militarization of outer space," Downer said.
The test has come as "a bit of a nasty shock," according to Kerry Brown, China expert and associate fellow at the international affairs thinktank Chatham House, in London. Politically, it is a sign that China will be extending its commercial and economic power to more military areas, he said.
Brown could not see any particular significance in the timing but he thought similar events would be more likely in the future.
"China is asserting its capacity, showing its ability to be autonomous and not needing to stand in anyone's shadow."
Some analysts suggested that the test was a warning shot directed at US operations in north-east Asia and US allies in the region, but played down the immediate implications for a future "Star Wars" crisis or a US-Chinese arms race.
The leading Liberal Democrat expert, Lord Wallace, said that the Chinese move had no direct impact on European security but would be likely to affect Europe because of the effect it would have on the US where a strong Republican lobby believes China is America's main threat.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS