China faced a barrage of international condemnation from London to Canberra on Friday after it was revealed that it had launched a missile attack on an aging weather satellite, a test that threatened to open a "Star Wars" space race.
Formal protests were lodged with the Beijing government, accompanied by expressions of concern from world leaders, including British Prime Minister Tony Blair. US President George W. Bush's administration is privately seething over the event and is believed to be preparing to turn the incident into a major diplomatic spat.
The concern in the US is that the satellite-killing missile test -- said by the US national security council to have been carried out on Jan. 11 -- demonstrated China has the capability to knock out its military satellite system, which the Pentagon depends on for navigation and surveillance.
US military and diplomatic analysts said a Chinese attack on about 40 to 50 satellites in low orbit round the world would leave the country's military blinded within a matter of hours.
But others, more sceptical about US policy, insist China had a right to challenge the US's effective monopoly of space. They noted that Beijing has repeatedly pressed for the US to sign agreements outlawing arms in space, overtures Washington has repeatedly rejected.
A Chinese government spokesman, Liu Jianchao (
The Russian government, which claims to favor demilitarization of space, expressed doubts about the nature of the test, claiming it was only a rumor that it was a demonstration of an anti-satellite capability. Its defense minister, Sergei Ivanov, said: "I'm afraid that it didn't have an anti-satellite basis. And, maybe, it's good that it didn't."
But the US, Britain, Japan, Australia and other countries had no doubts. London, while acknowledging China had broken no treaties, expressed dismay that it gave no advance warning of its action.
A spokesman at the prime minister's office at No. 10 Downing Street revealed that London had protested on Wednesday, arguing that the test is "inconsistent" with Beijing's earlier assurances to the UN on the military use of space, and will add to the space debris problem.
Downing Street said: "We don't believe that this does contravene international law. What we are concerned about, however, is lack of consultation and we believe that this development of this technology and the manner in which this test was conducted is inconsistent with the spirit of China's statements to the UN and other bodies on the military use of space."
The destruction of the Chinese satellite was the first such attack in space since the US carried out a similar test in 1985, when Ronald Reagan was pursuing the "Star Wars" anti-missile defense program.
The US, which has been trying to establish a closer relationship with China, has been reluctant recently to criticize Beijing but on Thursday lodged a formal protest.
Relations between the US and China have been improving since a stand-off in 2001 when a US surveillance aircraft was forced to land on Hainan island.
Dana Perino, the deputy White House press secretary, said Saturday that Chinese officials had not yet responded to concerns expressed by the US. "We do want cooperation on a civil space strategy, so until we hear back from them or have more information, I don't have any more to add," she said.
Although China offers no threat at present, the fear is that if there were a stand-off over Taiwan, the Chinese might be tempted by the option of destroying US satellites.
Worry was also expressed by China's near neighbors, Japan and South Korea. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said: "We must use space for peace. We are asking the Chinese government about the test."
Alexander Downer, the Australian foreign minister, who was on a visit to New York, said Beijing's ambassador to Australia, Fu Ying (
"Our concern about this is that to have a capacity to shoot down satellites in outer space is not consistent with ... the traditional Chinese position of opposition to the militarization of outer space," Downer said.
The test has come as "a bit of a nasty shock," according to Kerry Brown, China expert and associate fellow at the international affairs thinktank Chatham House, in London. Politically, it is a sign that China will be extending its commercial and economic power to more military areas, he said.
Brown could not see any particular significance in the timing but he thought similar events would be more likely in the future.
"China is asserting its capacity, showing its ability to be autonomous and not needing to stand in anyone's shadow."
Some analysts suggested that the test was a warning shot directed at US operations in north-east Asia and US allies in the region, but played down the immediate implications for a future "Star Wars" crisis or a US-Chinese arms race.
The leading Liberal Democrat expert, Lord Wallace, said that the Chinese move had no direct impact on European security but would be likely to affect Europe because of the effect it would have on the US where a strong Republican lobby believes China is America's main threat.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS