While tourists frolic in the crystal clear waters lapping the tropical island of Boracay, local natives forced from their land by developers are fighting for their piece of paradise lost.
With its warm blue waters, powder-fine white sand and palm fringed beach Boracay, in the central Philippines, is widely regarded as having one of the most beautiful beaches in the world.
But away from the foreshore, hotels and restaurants there is another side of paradise that many tourists don't see or simply choose to ignore.
For the community of Aboriginal Aeta -- descendants of the first Filipinos who are believed to have come to the archipelago tens of thousands of years ago -- the island that was once their sole domain is being taken away from them.
Many of Boracay's 180 Aeta people fear that soon they will be forced from the one-hectare plot that is their home.
Their concerns are hardly surprising. In front of their humble homes, a South Korean company is building a water sports center. Nearby, a 1.5m concrete wall is going up that will obliterate what tiny view they still have of the famous beach.
As the bricks and mortar move steadily towards them, few of the Aeta who live here have faith that a court order protecting them from eviction will save them from the encroachment of voracious developers eager to stake a claim to the profits on offer from the lucrative tourist industry.
"They are making us leave," said Paulo, a 30-year-old Aeta who asked that his full name not be used. "We know they will remove us once they need the land."
Bining Salibio, 68, who works as a laundry woman, said: "They build a wall and a building. They told us we would have to leave. I don't know where we will go."
The Aeta, a once-nomadic people who are generally shorter and darker, and have kinkier hair than most Filipinos, are considered the oldest inhabitants of the archipelago.
Historians believe they crossed from Borneo island to the Philippines between 20,000 and 30,000 years ago using a land bridge that was partially covered by water around 5,000 years ago.
They are among the first -- if not the first -- inhabitants of the Philippines, according to the official National Commission on Indigenous Peoples.
The commission says that there are about 140,500 Aeta left in the country.
Although some have migrated to urban areas, small pockets of Aeta, like those in Boracay, can still be found all around the country especially on the main island of Luzon.
But in Boracay, they have become almost invisible.
Over the last 20 years or so Boracay has grown into a world-class tourist destination. While it was originally a backpacker paradise, giant hotels and sprawling resorts are slowly spreading across the island's landscape.
Boracay's tourism revenues last year hit a record high of 9.18 billion pesos (US$183.64 million) brought by nearly half a million foreign and local tourists, according to the Department of Tourism.
Edwin Trompeta of the department's Western Visayas region said the amount represented a 16.5 percent increase over the 7.882 billion pesos recorded in 2004.
Visitor arrivals to the island grew by 16.5 percent to 499,457 last year, the latest figures available, from 428,755 a year earlier.
Unlike their counterparts in other Philippine cities who have turned to begging, the Aeta people of Boracay are known for their industriousness, and many work as carpenters, gardeners, janitors and general workers at the island's resorts.
The Aeta freely admit they do not own the land they live on, that they have simply been granted permission to stay there. But as development closes in, they are beginning to fear they may no longer have a place here.
The owners of the land, including the family of Congressman Wilfredo Miraflores, say they are only taking back plots they have allowed the Aeta to live on.
Miraflores, however, said an agreement is already in place between the landowners, the government and the Catholic diocese that cares for the Aeta to resettle them on another one-hectare site donated by a charitable foundation.
"They will be moved when the area is ready," he said, adding that a government commission for indigenous people was already designing houses for them.
Boracay Mayor Ciceron Cawaling said that infrastructure, including a school and a health center, will be set up on the new site and that the Aeta will be given certificates of land ownership to ensure they will not be pushed out later.
He adds that many of the Aeta are not native to Boracay, having come here from other regions to find work.
And he says the Roman Catholic nuns who set up a cooperative for the Aeta have been trying to talk them into staying where they are.
"We can't construct [the infrastructure] because the nuns are convincing the Aetas not to go there [to the new site]," he said.
One of the nuns working with the Aeta community, Sister Victoria Ostan, said: "They were staying in the beachfront of Boracay but since tourism arrived, they are being pushed back."
There have been no overtly violent efforts to eject the Aeta, she said, but they certainly felt pressure to leave and the morale of the community was suffering.
The Aeta village is a world away from Boracay's upscale resorts, with flimsy shacks perched in a muddy field and chickens, pigs and half-naked children milling about.
Sister Ostan says the Aeta suffer such health problems as tuberculosis and adds that malnutrition is widespread among the children, some of whom eat only one meal a day.
Many Aeta are practically illiterate, she said.
"They don't have enough money for health, nothing for education of children," she said, adding that the nuns provide some food aid and help with education.
While she knows of the plan for a new residential site, Ostan said many of the Aeta still worry it will not have adequate facilities and will be too far from their jobs.
They also worry that eventually they will be forced off that land, too, she said.
Nevertheless, she said, the Aeta won't put up much of a fight against any attempt to move them on.
"They are peaceful people. They are afraid to fight anybody," she said.
"That is the dilemma of the Aetas. If they don't like something, they just go away," she said.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS