When the campaign aimed at ousting President Chen Shui-bian (
The most obvious examples can be found among the anti-Chen actions on Ketagalan Boulevard, such as veteran actor Chin Ti's (
The crowd in red shouted along, forgetting that former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Without Chiang's crackdown on the democracy movement, Shih would never have been called "Taiwan's Nelson Mandela." But without the support of Chiang's followers, there would not be an anti-Chen demonstration today. In the face of this historical irony, it is hard to say if Shih has betrayed himself or if his pan-blue supporters have betrayed Chiang.
The former is probably more likely. When campaign spokeswoman Wang Lie-ping (王麗萍) called out "Republic of Taiwan" during a speech, she was booed by the crowd and had to issue a public apology, which showed the anti-independence sentiment of those participating in the sit-in.
By contrast, no one criticized Chin for praising the KMT. Nor was he given a dressing down in the way Shih lectured Liao Lin Li-ling (廖林麗玲), the Taiwan Solidarity Union's (TSU) candidate in the upcoming Taipei City councilor elections, when she suggested that the nation should apply for UN membership under the name "Taiwan" instead of the Republic of China.
I wonder what "Taiwan" -- a place that Shih sacrificed so much for -- means to the people dressed in red? Will he now compromise his past ideals just to maintain his leadership?
What is being betrayed here is not only the "Republic of Taiwan," but also the spirit of the nation's democratic history. If Shih really was one of the most important individuals in this historical discourse, his position is now at risk of being seriously distorted.
The campaign to depose Chen represents a certain set of values. But if these values are tied to Chiang's legacy, that would negate the claim to transcend partisan politics and the unification-independence debate. The protesters would inadvertently become the political mainstream.
Some academics are so naive. They see the "love" and non-violence demonstrated on Ketagalan Boulevard as a beautiful song that will purify people's hearts and develop into a new creed. They also believe that even if Chen does not resign, the seeds of democracy have been firmly planted. However, the confrontation between the pan-blue and pan-green camps would only lead to rising hatred and violence, and possibly even to a national strike that would feed social unrest.
The Kaohsiung Incident in 1979 remains a milestone in Taiwan's democratic development. Its influence has actually increased over time. Answering the question of whether the campaign's "siege"of the Presidential Office on Friday was a glorious replay of the Kaohsiung Incident or a betrayal of that incident is critical for evaluating the nation's democratization, and Shih's role in that movement.
Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant research fellow in the Sun Yat-sen Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS