According to Chinese-language media reports, the UN will abandon its policy of using both simplified and full-form Chinese characters in 2008, when it will start using only China's simplified system. This move is tantamount to changing the "cultural status quo," making Taiwan the last independent repository (unlike Hong Kong) of traditional Chinese script.
China's simplified system was invented after Mao Zedong's (
China's economic development has expanded the influence of culture and other "soft powers," thereby sparking a global interest in Chinese culture. China has taken advantage of these developments to set up "Confucian academies" (
The traditional Chinese script is a writing system that has evolved over thousands of years. Not only is the traditional system freely adaptable to changing conditions, but it is also an art form through which calligraphic styles can be presented in an artistic fashion. The simplified Chinese writing system is by no means as artistic. And even if the UN abandons full-form characters in favor of the simplified system, the use of traditional script will remain orthodox in Chinese calligraphy.
The Chinese Communist Party has in recent years turned away from the excesses of the Cultural Revolution by once again revering Confucius and establishing Confucian academies around the world. Publications relating to Confucius, Mencius (
A common language and writing system is a prerequisite for territorial and ethnic integration. The strongest foundation for cross-strait exchanges is that both sides once used the same writing system. Be it pressure from Beijing or UN efforts to cut down on costs by using only simplified Chinese characters, the move to eradicate full-form characters reeks of politics and seeks to restrict the continued evolution of Chinese script. By doing so, it will leave each side of the Taiwan Strait with its own writing system, further contributing to their division. This might turn out to be a good thing for Taiwan.
Full-form characters may appear to be at a disadvantage, as the nation and its traditional script become even more isolated. But from another perspective, they allow Taiwan to lay ironic claim to greater cultural independence.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this