According to Chinese-language media reports, the UN will abandon its policy of using both simplified and full-form Chinese characters in 2008, when it will start using only China's simplified system. This move is tantamount to changing the "cultural status quo," making Taiwan the last independent repository (unlike Hong Kong) of traditional Chinese script.
China's simplified system was invented after Mao Zedong's (
China's economic development has expanded the influence of culture and other "soft powers," thereby sparking a global interest in Chinese culture. China has taken advantage of these developments to set up "Confucian academies" (
The traditional Chinese script is a writing system that has evolved over thousands of years. Not only is the traditional system freely adaptable to changing conditions, but it is also an art form through which calligraphic styles can be presented in an artistic fashion. The simplified Chinese writing system is by no means as artistic. And even if the UN abandons full-form characters in favor of the simplified system, the use of traditional script will remain orthodox in Chinese calligraphy.
The Chinese Communist Party has in recent years turned away from the excesses of the Cultural Revolution by once again revering Confucius and establishing Confucian academies around the world. Publications relating to Confucius, Mencius (
A common language and writing system is a prerequisite for territorial and ethnic integration. The strongest foundation for cross-strait exchanges is that both sides once used the same writing system. Be it pressure from Beijing or UN efforts to cut down on costs by using only simplified Chinese characters, the move to eradicate full-form characters reeks of politics and seeks to restrict the continued evolution of Chinese script. By doing so, it will leave each side of the Taiwan Strait with its own writing system, further contributing to their division. This might turn out to be a good thing for Taiwan.
Full-form characters may appear to be at a disadvantage, as the nation and its traditional script become even more isolated. But from another perspective, they allow Taiwan to lay ironic claim to greater cultural independence.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has