Your newspaper reported that the People First Party (PFP) legislative caucus claimed that pro-independence soldiers have been granted leave to vote in Saturday's local government elections, while the pro-unification ones have not ("Soldiers' leave on Saturday has become politicized: PFP," Nov. 29, page 3).
I think this allegation is unfair, and insults the armed forces.
Earlier last month, the Ministry of National Defense ordered that military personnel may not get involved in political activities, in order to maintain neutrality.
The accusation that the ministry is trying to manipulate the election by giving leave to conscripts who support the pan-green camp, and is even transporting them by bus to Taipei County to vote on Saturday, is completely groundless.
Second, the military has never proposed any change in leave policy for officers and enlisted personnel for election day. Military personnel will follow normal weekend schedules which determine whether they have leave this Saturday, because soldiers' leave is normally planned one month in advance, and the leave schedule is made public.
Last but not the least, Taiwan's modern society is free and democratic. Soldiers are of course influenced by democratic politics and decide for themselves which candidate to support. There is no use requesting any military personnel to support specific candidates. Anyone efforts to use improper methods to manipulate the election will be futile.
As the director-general of Political Warfare Bureau General Hu Zhenpu (
Taiwan was once a place where people were simple, decent and magnanimous. However, with the recent scandals disclosed by the media, Taiwan is now buffeted by an "expose culture." Such a culture is even more out of control at election time.
Politicians "expose" scandals whether or not they have any basis for doing so. Consequently, the general public's dislike of politicians increases while Taiwan sinks farther into the bog of attack politics.
Zhu Jin-long
Taichung
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS