Toward the end of last year, many lexicographers agreed that the word of the year was blog, from "Web log," with its extension of bloggers, commentators with Internet addresses who had joined the panjandrums of political media.
Then disaster struck. The word to describe the event that will fix the year in the history of geologic catastrophe and the resulting human tragedy is tsunami, from the Japanese tsu, "harbor," and nami, "waves."
At first report, many of us called the cataclysm a tidal wave. That's imprecise; the Oxford English Dictionary defines its primary sense as "the high water wave caused by the movement of the tide," noting that the common belief that it was a huge wave caused by an earthquake was mistaken. An 1899 citation from The Daily News of Perth, Australia, explained the difference: "The tidal wave sweeps round the earth twice in the 24 hours; the great wave produced by an earthquake, erroneously described sometimes as a `tidal wave,' has nothing tidal about it, and it is called by scientific men `a free wave."'
Journalists a century later who turned to The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage in writing about the Asian flooding were reminded of the difference: "Tidal wave is restricted in scientific terminology to a sea wave that is due chiefly to the effects of lunar gravity. For the wave induced by an earthquake or submarine landslide, tsunami is the correct scientific term. Because it is relatively obscure, tsunami should be explained."
Obscure no more. "`Tsunami!' shrieked the people; and then all shrieks and all sounds and all power to hear sounds were annihilated by a nameless shock ... as the colossal swell smote the shore with a weight that sent a shudder through the hills." That was a description in 1897 by Lafcadio Hearn, an Irish-American reporter who became a Japanese citizen, traveling through what he called the "Buddha-fields." Reports of the tsunami of our time, with front-page color photos and televised footage of the dead and the suffering survivors, brought to the world the horror in Asia on what is being called Black Sunday. A NASA geophysicist reported that the quake, and the huge, nearly supersonic waves it caused, resulted in the planet tilting about 2.5cm on its axis and spinning 3 microseconds faster. Rarely does the word earth-shaking have a literal sense.
We are more accustomed to the figurative use of disaster vocabulary. Mark Twain wrote his publisher in 1870 to "have somebody standing ready to launch a book right on our big tidal wave and swim it into a success." In last year's campaign, Newsweek praised two former aides to Senator Ted Kennedy: "Both should take enormous credit for helping Kerry survive the Howard Dean tsunami." And The New York Times accurately predicted the Democratic ticket would carry New York "barring a tsunami of a sweep." For a time, in light of the impact of a real rather than metaphoric disaster, political writers will hesitate to use the metaphor that causes so many shudders, reverting instead to the less fearsome landslide, avalanche,surge and firestorm. Like holocaust, the word tsunami must now be used with sensitivity.
Disaster Synonymy
"Disaster is etymologically a mishap due to a baleful stellar aspect," wrote William Whitney, a predecessor of mine, in 1875. Right on: astrum is Latin for "star," and the stars were believed to foretell destiny, fortune, fate or hap (meaning "luck"). In Hamlet, Shakespeare's Horatio bewailed "Stars with trains of fire and dews of blood, Disasters in the sun ..."
In current usage, disaster is the general term for "everything going wrong." Because of its frequent, loose, inclusive use -- from a specific ruination, failure or misfortune to an exaggerated "that outfit is a disaster" and as an attributive noun in disaster area or disaster movie -- the word is losing some of its fearsomeness. We are not discussing mere fiascos, debacles or misfortunes; in the synonymy of disaster, there are the three c's: catastrophe, calamity and cataclysm.
Catastrophe is a Latin and Greek word for "overthrowing or overturning; a sudden ending." In ancient theater, a play began with a protasis, or introduction, and ended with a catastrophe, or conclusion, driven by some irresistible cause; in French, that finish was the "denouement." That was Shakespeare's meaning in "King Lear," when the bastard Edmund says of his brother "pat, he comes, like the catastrophe of the old comedy." (When the Bard turned bawd, however, he played on the second syllable: "Away you scullion ... I'll tickle your catastrophe." In the same irreverent spirit, a mock-furious Jimmy Durante would say "It's a catastrastroke!" -- a creative meld of catastrophe and thunderstroke, "a clap of thunder accompanied by a streak of lightning.")
Over the centuries, the sudden ending evolved into some horrendous finality: Charles Darwin, in his 1859 "Origin of Species," derided "the old notion of all the inhabitants of the earth having been swept away by catastrophes." He was dismissing the "theory of cataclysms" or "doctrine of violent upheavals" that held that population was recreated after all life was periodically destroyed.
Calamity, from the Latin for "damage," now means an event causing distress in multitudes feeling grievous personal loss. Merriam-Webster's invaluable 1984 Dictionary of Synonyms gives this example: "the rout at Bull Run was a disaster for the North, but the assassination of President Lincoln was a calamity." The heavy word was lightened up by a frontier prostitute, sharpshooter and heroine of Deadwood, South Dakota, who famously warned, "If you scorn Martha Jane Cannary, you court calamity."
Cataclysm is the Greek word for "deluge; to wash over, as a wave," especially directed at the Flood in which the biblical Noah survived. In 1637, the playwright Thomas Heywood called it "the first Universal Cataclisme." Though it is used about other natural and political upheavals, its central semantic element is watery doom. That makes cataclysm, in my book, the most apt name for the tsunami of 2004.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS