When Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) inspected the Chinglu Detention Center for illegal Chinese immigrants in Hsinchu on June 15, he called on China to improve its efforts to halt the flood of illegal immigrants and for the two sides to sign an agreement dealing with their return to China, in an attempt at eliminating the problem once and for all. Wu correctly pointed out that the problem cannot be resolved by Taiwan alone.
This is yet another sign of goodwill on Taiwan's part, yet a solution relies not only on political forces on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, but also on social forces.
Is is absolutely not a matter of what President Chen Shui-bian (
Whether they come here of their own accord and the question of rights for sex workers are issues which simply do not arise, because this is not a free market, but a brutally controlled human meat market. Approximately 2,000 illegal immigrants are caught every year, but the actual number of people who are brought here illegally is much higher.
The existence of such a market shames both the Taiwanese and Chinese societies. Taiwan creates the demand, and China meets it. The underworld and corrupt forces in civil society in China and Taiwan run this market together. For political reasons, China's passivity in bringing these illegal immigrants home reveals the government's attitude toward its own people.
And what about Taiwan? As people are continually exposed to news reports about illegal immigrants being mistreated by boat crews and police using prostitutes to make an extra dollar, public curiosity in these Chinese women gradually abates and people begin to ignore the issue, telling themselves that these women belong to another, underground society, totally unrelated to their own lives.
China's reluctance to have these people returned adds to the misfortunes of the 1,000 to 2,000 people in Taiwanese detention centers. But shouldn't Taiwanese society also take the initiative to eliminate this inhumane market? The theory of supply and demand can only explain existing phenomena, but progressive social forces can actively change phenomena.
Tolerating the existence of such an exploitative, inhumane market further erodes the benevolent foundations of Taiwanese society. Maybe the human meat market will not enter your community, work place or social circles, but it exists in Taiwan, and it is expanding.
Not only does the political tension between China and Taiwan allow the two sides to ignore the responsibility of finding solutions to jointly created social problems, it has also become the force underlying the emergence of new problems. China allows Taiwanese gangsters to settle down in China, and during the recent presidential election, they were even allowed to organize. China's behavior will not only cost Taiwan and the cross-strait relationship dearly. These criminal forces will also erode Chinese society, leading to worsening bureaucratic rule and abuse of the public. Would a rational and responsible government try to destroy an opponent at the cost of throwing its own people into crisis?
Civil society on either side of the Taiwan Strait may have different views on the unification-independence issue, but based on a common belief in progress and a humane society, they should solve issues harmful to both societies together and share their common social values.
The exploitative human meat market and domineering criminal gangs should not be allowed, and the arms race's guarantee of mutual destruction is a price that must be paid by several generations of people. Progressive forces in both societies must take the initiative to suppress evil and create good conditions.
If they don't, a price will have to be paid by the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Although the two sides have different political ideals, they should share the dream of progress.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS