The Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation (TRTC) scandal in which as many as 127 TRTC employees were discovered to have "free-loaded" off their company and all law-abiding MRT passengers should not come as a surprise. What is surprising, however, is the Taipei City Government's mishandling of the incident from the outset.
The scandal is not surprising for several reasons. The first is a continuing lack of understanding of the concept of "rule of law" and respect for "law and order" in the local culture, especially with regard to petty crimes, with two distinguishing characteristics -- widespread prevalence and miniscule monetary losses to the victim or victims.
In terms of the former, the line of reasoning goes as follows: "Everyone is doing it, why can't I?" It is precisely because of this logic that at least 127 TRTC employees were involved in the scam, some of them supervisors, and that each of them felt his or her guilty conscience somewhat eased.
Another good case in point is copyright infringement on university campuses, where students freely photocopy expensive textbooks in foreign languages because everyone else is doing it.
The fact that every time the crime is perpetrated only a small amount of money is stolen from the person holding the copyright also blurs the criminal nature of the conduct. This is the case especially when the losses are spread among a large number of people, such as MRT passengers, or among big conglomerates, such as foreign publishing companies in copyright infringement cases.
Each time petty crimes of this nature are perpetrated, some people will come out and say things such as "These people are young, give them a second chance." That was what happens in the copyright infringement cases, and that is what is happening again in the TRTC scandal. But, there must be a reason that the law sets the age of 18 as the demarcation line to distinguish between adults and juveniles. Isn't it the intention of the law to say that once a person is 18, he or she must be fully and legally responsible for his or her conduct? Otherwise, why not just raise the age limit to 30?
These people may very well have committed crimes such as embezzlement, theft and forgery. These are legal issues that should be left to the prosecutors and courts to address. Yet, it was surprising to learn that, before the media reported on the scandal, the TRTC had intended to take care of the matter internally. Reportedly, it had asked the employees in question to sign a letter promising to decline from similar conduct in the future. Supposedly, that was going to end the matter once and for all. That is of course utterly shocking. Had this happened in any other private company, these people would have long ago received much more severe punishment, or even would have been sacked.
The TRTC is entirely owned by the Taipei City Government, and the chairman and president of the company are civil servants.
Under the circumstances, while it remains to be determined whether, technically speaking, TRTC employees should be considered civil servants (if they are, the 127 in question may face an additional criminal charge of corruption), their conduct should be measured against a higher standard.
However, that is precisely the problem with many civil servants in this country. While in other countries it is demanded of civil servants to adhere to high ethical standards, civil servants here have traditionally been considered a privileged class. While the situation has certainly improved over the past years, much remains to be done. The scandal at the TRTC serves as an opportunity to set a good example.
Under the circumstances, the decision of City Hall to merely punish the TRTC chairman verbally and give the president a demerit was simply not enough.
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
RSS