The Ministry of Education has recently opted to ban all pre-schools from teaching English beginning in 2005. The logic behind this move is to standardize the language curriculum under which English and other foreign languages can only be taught starting from the third grade and to give top priority to learning the mother tongues, followed by Mandarin and then foreign languages.
This decision by the director of the ministry's Department of Elementary Education, Wu Tsai-shun (
This plan illustrates the negative impact of the strong centralization of education policy dominated by the ministry. This policy illustrates the negative impact of politics as a motivation for education policy. This plan illustrates the ministry's continued inability to correctly assess the educational needs of Taiwan.
Many people are unaware of the scope of ministry centralized control over the nation's education system. The main purpose of government involvement in education design has been to enhance the nation's development strategies and economic competitiveness. Since the mid-1960s, the Council for International Cooperation and Development (later the Council for Economic Planning and Development) linked education policies to economic goals under its manpower plans.
The most obvious repercussion of this strategy is the government's commitment to vocational training as opposed to general education. The second, less obvious, repercussion of the education planning policies is the creation of an ex-cess of vocational five-year junior colleges and four-year technology-oriented private colleges that are in effect vocational in nature.
On Dec. 12 last year Vice Minister of Education Lu Mu-lin (呂木琳) stated that "This situation has resulted in rapid excessive and development [of schools], poor student teacher ratios and the lowering of the quality of education overall."
In January, Minister of Education Huang Jong-tsun (
Education reform has recently become been a major point of political contention and education policy. Unfortunately, the overwhelming response is that these reforms are inappropriate and not working. In a televised broadcast on Feb. 22, President Chen Shui-bian (
Between Dec. 3 last year and Jan. 3, Global Views Monthly conducted a survey 2,245 seventh grade students from 70 schools nationwide, as well as 238 parents and 111 teachers. The survey showed that 70 percent of parents and teachers would like the government to reinstate the Joint College Entrance Exam.
Ninety percent of teachers surveyed said that they were having trouble keeping up with the times and having trouble teaching the new material. Teachers argued that the main reason they were having difficulties is that the education ministry's policy flip-flops have left them confused.
Of students surveyed, 54 percent claimed that they had to go to cram schools because the education reforms have failed to relieve academic pressure. The 46 percent who did not attend cram schools did not do so because they could not afford it. Students feel powerless against the various interests that create their education culture.
Now it seems that the ministry, whose top officials admit has failed the cause of higher education, will now inflict preschool with its peculiar brand of incompetence. The logic behind banning English-language training in preschools is inconsistent with the ministry's institutional logic of economic development through education.
Increasing English-language proficiency will only serve to elevate the nation's ability to be effective in the emerging global economy and to advance the employment and international education options of the nation's young people.
Giving priority to mother tongues is illogical in the pursuit of establishing Mandarin as a national language. The prioritization of indigenous languages serves no practical long-term purpose other than satisfying certain political interests while preventing teachers and schools from giving young students an advantage that could benefit them for their entire lives.
Given its admitted failures in higher education, the recent debacle in education reform policy and this ridiculous new policy on preschool education, perhaps it is time for the ministry to take a good hard look at itself before its vainglorious attempts bring further harm to students and teachers.
Simply put, the ministry is too powerful and too far removed from the needs and interests of its true clients: the students, parents and teachers. Entrenched inter-ests, bureaucratic stagnation, and a blinding centralization of power has allowed for the continued implementation of illogical, un-suitable and incompetent policies.
It seems obvious that before Taiwan can effectively fulfill it constitutional promise of universal education, the people and the government need to seriously consider reforming the ministry.
George Thompson is an assistant professor in the department of applied foreign languages at Kai Nan University in Taoyuan.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS