US aircraft manufacturer Boeing has canceled a visit to its Seattle facilities by Vice President Annette Lu (
Since Boeing has opted to risk retaliation from Taipei for the sake of its economic interests elsewhere, it obviously does not care about Taiwan's dignity. Without mutual trust, it will be inappropriate for the government to continue its business relations with Boeing.
Is Boeing thinking of canceling the contract it signed with China Airlines (CAL) last year for the sale of 10 commercial jetliners? If it did, we believe neither the government nor CAL would demand inordinate amounts of compensation from Boeing. Apparently Boeing believes it can sacrifice Taiwan's market to secure larger economic benefits, so the immediate cancellation of the contract would be in both sides' interest. This will prevent more serious disputes -- whether political or commercial -- in the future. Such a clean-cut solution will also prevent further mutual suspicion and its endless undesirable consequences.
What's most deplorable about this incident is not the attitude of either Boeing or the US government. Rather, it is the infantile mentality exhibited by the pan-blue camp.
They do not believe the humiliation accorded to Lu is a humiliation for all Taiwanese. On the contrary, they claim that the incident was a result of what they call Lu's "erroneous" trip. Such an attitude is the root cause of the chaos facing politics in this country today.
The opposition may disagree with the government on many domestic policies, but Chen Shui-bian (
Don't forget: the DPP cannot possibly stay in power forever. Any party has a chance to win power as long as it works hard to win the hearts of the people. If the pan-blue camp carries on with its vendetta, it will mean any president or vice president -- no matter which party they are from -- are likely to be trampled upon by the opposition parties in a similar manner. In fact, the opposition parties and pro-unification media have never been respectful toward Chen and Lu. Perhaps their erratic behavior and distorted reports have been the reasons why Boeing has treated Taiwan with such contempt.
People who do not respect themselves will be humiliated by others. The Boeing incident is perhaps a wake-up call for the Taiwanese. Where exactly does your loyalty lie? What stance do you take when a leader of your country is humiliated? It's time for the people to think about this question.
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS