British Prime Minister Tony Blair is one of the few public figures to avoid the curse of the information age -- spam e-mail. This is because, as was admitted last week, he has no e-mail address. That is not a solution available to most people for whom e-mail has become a necessity.
Yet only six years ago, Andy Grove, chief executive of Intel, the microchip manufacturer, warned a stunned audience in Davos, Switzerland, that Europe was falling behind in the productivity race because use of e-mail and the Internet was only 20 percent of US levels.
Not any more. Europe has largely caught up and is suffering from an epidemic of e-mails. There have been gains in productivity -- instant access to peers, instant decisions and the ability to speedily send complicated documents and pictures. But these are in danger of being overwhelmed by the anxiety generated by hundreds of unopened e-mails, most of them junk, and the time it takes to get rid of them. And this is without counting the time wasted by employees e-mailing each other and friends. E-mails now follow people home, extend work to weekends and negate the therapeutic value of holidays by piling up in their hundreds to await your return.
Spam -- named after the famous British comedy Monty Python sketch -- is reckoned to account for almost half of all e-mails. According to the Radicati Group, a market research company, 14.5 billion spam messages will be sent each day this year (the equivalent of more than two for every person on the planet), rising to 58 billion by 2007.
This not only annoys recipients but also takes up valuable "bandwidth" on the Internet.
In the past six months the familiar diet of junk mail (clear your debts, take out a cheap mortgage, etc) has been joined by an avalanche of sex-related e-mails, including thrice-daily offers of Viagra or member enlargement, plus access to "horny" Web cameras. For most people these are merely an irritant -- but the messages are also received by children. A survey by Symantec, an Internet security company, of 1,000 net users between seven and 18 years of age showed that 47 percent had received e-mails with links to X-rated sites.
Although 51 percent said they were annoyed by such mail, 38 percent did not tell their parents what they had seen and 22 percent said their parents never talked to them about spam.
What can be done? The logical reaction -- to reply by asking to be taken off the e-mailing list -- should be avoided at all costs. It simply tells the spammer that yours is a "live" e-mail address and so worth exploiting further or selling to someone else. Super-spammers send up to half a billion messages a day. If only 100 recipients take the bait, it is worthwhile since e-mails cost next to nothing to output.
Most computers come with filtering software that siphons messages that have been mass mailed (plus any unwanted addresses) into a separate folder. This can be viewed from time to time to see if anything worthwhile has slipped through.
There are also companies such as Brightmail (www.brightmail.com) that sell counter-spamming software and voluntary movements such as Spamhaus (www.spamhaus.org) dedicated to eliminating the problem. But these approaches merely treat the symptoms, not the causes -- the spammers themselves.
The good news is that spam has become such a problem that politicians are waking up. The EU will have legislation in place by the end of the year under which bulk commercial e-mailers will be able to e-mail only those who have "opted in" to a mailing list. But that won't stop rogue operators who will merely move their operations offshore. In any case, Europe is responsible for less than 10 percent of offending e-mails.
Spam is overwhelmingly an American phenomenon, or more correctly a Floridian one. Steve Linford, of Spamhaus, estimates that fewer than 150 spammers are responsible for 90 percent of spam received in Europe and the US -- and at least 40 are located in the Boca Raton area of Florida.
After years of dilly-dallying, the US Congress is conducting hearings on the subject and several bills have been put forward. The trouble is that less than 5 percent of bills become law. But others are moving faster. The California Senate passed a bill last month outlawing junk e-mail, which will enable recipients of unauthorized messages to get state backing to sue for US$500 for each "slice of spam" received.
Last week the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) asked Congress for controversial powers to secretly investigate senders of unauthorized mail and also to track down spammers who dispatch their wares across international borders. FTC Commissioner Orson Swindle argues that "spam has become the weapon of choice for those engaged in fraud and deception."
In Britain, Derek Wyatt, chairman of the House of Commons all-party Internet group, is holding a "spam summit" in London on July 1.
He said on Thursday that the problem would not be solved until a worldwide body was able to enforce the necessary changes. Others say that if charges were levied for e-mail, spamming would no longer be economic and mass mailers would disappear. But such a move would be controversial -- it goes against the free-to-all spirit of the Web and would require radical changes in the infrastructure of the Internet.
It looks as though it will be some time before the problem is eliminated. Until then there is no alternative to palliative action.
Unless, of course, we take a lead from the prime minister.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS