Since the pan-blue camp finalized its joint ticket featuring KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Presidential candidates always select their partners in the hope of adding to their electoral support, giving due consideration to each party's political maneuvers. Less emphasis, however, is put on overall national policy and development since the vice president is not given real power.
It is cause for concern that the vice president might end up becoming nothing more than an electoral tool if the post is used only for electoral considerations. At the same time, hype about running mates may distract voters from campaign platforms (all you need to do is put a political star on the ticket). We therefore need to reflect on the role and position of the vice president from a constitutional angle.
Basically, because the development of the Constitution has long been constrained by historical factors and the rule of man (as opposed to the rule of law), in addition to the profound influence of the US, the nation's constitutional system and power structure are tilting toward a presidential system. Although several constitutional amendments have sought to shift it toward a "semi-presidential" system, they often increased the president's power, rather than curtailing it.
In particular, since direct elections for the president and vice president were first held, all party leaders have viewed the presidency as their lifetime ambition.
Strategically, a presidential candidate always chooses his or her running mate out of consideration of his or her electoral support.
So Chen teamed up with Lu in 2000, aiming to achieve a gender balance and canvass support from female and pro-independence voters. The pairing of Soong with Chang Chao-hsiung (張昭雄) was meant to provide a counter-balance to Soong's mainlander image. The Lien-Siew ticket was based on the consideration of integrating administrative resources.
It is no different in presidential elections in the US. Presidential candidates there also pick their partners with an eye on increasing their electoral support. According to the US Constitution, the post of vice president is merely a stand-by position with no power. Political science scholars usually describe the US vice president as the "fifth wheel."
A look at Taiwan's constitutional history shows that most of the vice presidents during the KMT's autocratic rule did not have any policy-making power. Former vice president Li Yuan-tzu (李元簇), in office at the early years of former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) government, did a very good job in playing a silent role. After the first popular presidential election in 1996, Lien would not have been able to exercise any power as vice president if Lee had not appointed him to serve concurrently as premier.
Although constitutional amendments stipulate that presidential and vice presidential candidates must pair up on the same ticket and although the legitimacy of the public will and the voter base cannot be divided between the two, this does not mean that the president's power can be shared. The Constitution does not allow the vice president to ask for a role in policy-making unless he or she is authorized by the president to do so.
So even though the two candidates must run on the same ticket and be jointly held to scrutiny by the public, as stipulated in the constitution, the vice president is a spare tire at best, despite being constantly highlighted during election campaigns.
As the speculation continues as to who will be Chen's partner, we should reflect on whether the "chicken rib" role played by the vice president is appropriate. Since recent constitutional amendments have shifted toward establishing a semi-presidential system, we might do well to emulate the systems adopted in France and South Korea. France does not have a vice president. If the president passes away or cannot continue in office, the head of the National Assembly will take over until a new president is elected.
Presidential candidates simply want to showcase their dream-team partners to back their platforms, but those partners cannot put forward concrete policies for national development. The pairings risk becoming nothing more than marriages of convenience to divide up the political spoils. That being the case, how do presidential elections facilitate democratic development?
Wang Tuoh is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also