A joint presidential ticket has become a reality. Lien Chan (
Prior to that announcement, in response to press inquiries about the possibility of a Lien-Soong ticket, Soong's wife Chen Wan-shui (陳萬水) said, "The general trend is clear but has not been announced." A few months ago, when the two parties were still undecided about the joint ticket, Chen said, "Soong will be able to handle any position." The next day, PFP legislators sought to put a positive gloss on their comment. With the benefit of hindsight, we can infer from Chen's words that no formal procedures were undertaken before the announcement of the KMT-PFP coalition and the Lien-Soong ticket. The two party chairmen made the decision in private, well before its announcement.
As a result of that private decision, the KMT paved the way for a Lien-Soong ticket by first revising a clause in the party charter that aimed at excluding Soong. Next, Lien, as the party chairman, actively sought party members' signatures for himself. Lien, in the end, was able to easily collect more than 250,000 signatures endorsing him on the last day of the registration period for the party's primary election.
The KMT, PFP, Lien, and Soong all deny the practice of "backroom politics." But if this was not backroom politics, what was it? The private arrangement clearly violates due party procedure and has no legitimacy. But the main question is: will it gain the blessing of center-ground voters?
What is more important is this "unannounced" agreement creates fools of the two parties. Unless the parties as a whole are less than perfectly happy with the private arrangement, it makes no sense for outsiders to criticize it. But how will Lien and Soong divide the presidential and vice presidential powers if they get elected? They will have to let the voters know where they stand on this, or the people will worry about the government tearing itself apart in power struggles.
A clash is inevitable. Take a look at the presidential election in South Korea five years ago. The extreme-left and the extreme-right parties built a coalition to ensure victory. Kim Dae-jung drew Kim Jong-pil to his side by offering to revise the nation's Constitution after the election and replace the presidential system with a cabinet system. The upshot was that Kim Dae-jung broke his promise. Will Soong be perfectly happy if Lien follows the South Korean precedent and breaks his promise? If Lien does break his promise, personal and party clashes will ensue. In the end, the people will be the biggest losers.
Lien and Soong still haven't told us how they propose to share power. They must not be allowed to dismiss the question by saying that "the announcement will be made after the general trend [ie, voter sentiment] is clear."
They must give us a clear and precise answer.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Grace Shaw
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS